Chicago Sun-Times

SMALL VICTORY FOR THE AMERICAN VOTER

-

The bedrock of our American democracy, the right to vote, was strengthen­ed Monday— or at least got a reprieve from the jackhammer­s— when the U. S. Supreme Court declined to come to the defense of a North Carolina law baldly designed to make it harder for African- Americans to vote.

By refusing to accept the case, the Supreme Court left in place a federal appeals court ruling that largely guts the North Carolina law, saying it disenfranc­hised black voters with “almost surgical precision.”

But forgive us for not cheering. The battle to protect and expand the voting franchise to every qualified American citizen is far from won. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts made it clear Monday that the court refused to take the North Carolina case only for procedural reasons. Similar voting rights cases are sure to be taken up by the court, which now includes the conservati­ve justice Neil Gorsuch, and nobody can confidentl­y predict how it will rule.

Adding an ominous air to the uncertaint­y, President Donald Trump last week announced the creation of a commission to investigat­e voter fraud— a commission almost sure to call for redoubling efforts to restrict voting, on the pretext of curtailing voter fraud. Chairman of the commission is Vice President Mike Pence. Vice chairman of the commission is Kansas Secretary of State KrisW. Kobach. Both men have worked hard to restrict voting in their own states and across the nation, despite convincing studies that conclude largescale voter fraud is almost unheard of.

In actuality, voter ID laws, rollbacks in early voting and the eliminatio­n of same- day voter registrati­on— all trumpeted as guards against fraudulent voting— are tools used by Republican- dominated state legislatur­es to discourage voting by Democrats. African- Americans, who overwhelmi­ng vote Democratic, are particular­ly targeted.

On Monday, Dale Ho, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Voting Rights Project, declared that “an ugly chapter in voter suppressio­n is finally closing.” And the ACLU of North Carolina said the high court’s ruling “sends a strong message.”

But, with all respect to the ACLU, that’s awfully optimistic talk. Republican­s, especially in the South, will continue to seek ways to discourage voting blocs aligned with Democrats from casting ballots.

In North Carolina, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, dismissing the justificat­ion there for a voter ID law, noted that the state could not point to a single person “who has ever been charged with committing in- person voter fraud in North Carolina.” There is, however, evidence of absentee voting fraud, and white voters are disproport­ionately more likely to be absentee voters.

Unsurprisi­ngly, the North Carolina legislatur­e did not attempt to reduce that kind of fraud.

 ?? | J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/ AP FILE ?? Visitors arrive last month at the Supreme Court inWashingt­on.
| J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/ AP FILE Visitors arrive last month at the Supreme Court inWashingt­on.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States