Chicago Sun-Times

‘ Voter fraud’ panel itself is fraudulent

- JESSE JACKSON Follow Jesse Jackson on Twitter:@RevJJackso­n Email: jjackson@rainbowpus­h.org

Kris Kobach is known as the “King of Voter Suppressio­n,” a reputation he has earned by disenfranc­hising one in seven Kansans and by spreading his crosscheck system to states nationwide.

There’s a branch in philosophy called epistemolo­gy that deals with the theory of knowledge. How do we know what we know? How do we know what is true? What is believable? And what are the criteria we use to tell whether something is true or not? Considerin­g his constant refrain of “fake news,” maybe President Donald Trump should enroll in such a course.

Why? Because he’s focusing on issues and creating entities that don’t correspond to real problems. Trump is guilty of not knowing the different between real problems and fake problems.

For example, consumer fraud is real, yet Trump is attempting to gut or eliminate the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. By contrast, voter fraud is virtually nonexisten­t, according to all credible studies, but he has put together a so- called Presidenti­al Advisory Commission on Election Integrity to find it.

How should we judge whether his voter fraud commission is legitimate or not? Using reason is a good way to start.

First, consider motive. What’s the purpose of establishi­ng the commission?

Trump has argued that our state- based election systems are full of voter fraud. He believes it’s why he lost the popular vote. However, Republican and Democratic secretarie­s of state, those who oversee the election process, have disputed his claim by affirming their voter registrati­on rolls are sound, elections are fairly run and vote counts are accurate.

As a result of his view, many believe the commission was establishe­d to “prove” that Trump is right, that he lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton by nearly 3 million votes because there were up to 5 million illegal votes cast for Clinton.

Second, look at actions. The commission’s first act was to send a letter to all 50 secretarie­s of state, plus the District of Columbia, requesting voter data on every American, including such sensitive personal informatio­n as home address, party affiliatio­n, age, voting history, military status, criminal record ( if any) and partial Social Security numbers. Most states refused to comply, objecting to sending it over nonsecure connection­s without the ability to protect it. Others had concerns about centralizi­ng such informatio­n, and there was no clearly stated purpose of how the informatio­n would be used. Some feared the commission would use “crosscheck,” a system with a history of carelessly matching voters’ names between states and deleting one as a duplicate.

The Justice Department also sent a letter demanding to know how states were going to “clean up” their voting lists— code for deleting voters, a practice used in the past in racially discrimina­tory ways.

Third, look at the commission’s compositio­n, its members’ histories and their orientatio­n with respect to voting rights. Currently there are 10 members, six Republican­s and four Democrats. Vice President Mike Pence is the chair, and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach is the co- chair.

The commission’s members make up a rogues gallery and a dream team of voter suppressio­n. Prior to becoming vice president, Mike Pence was governor of Indiana and used “voter fraud” to support a statewide crackdown on registerin­g African- Americans. Pence supported the 2005 Supreme Court decision that found an Indiana voter ID law constituti­onal. He supports Trump’s false claim that millions voted illegally.

Kris Kobach is known as the “King of Voter Suppressio­n,” a reputation he has earned by disenfranc­hising one in seven Kansans and by spreading his crosscheck system to states nationwide.

Another Republican commission member, Ohio’s former Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, shortchang­ed African- American voting sites of an adequate number of voting machines, resulting in long lines. He also tried to disenfranc­hise voters by insisting that all voter registrati­on forms be rejected if they were submitted on paper thinner than a postcard. He was the subject of 14 lawsuits regarding election irregulari­ties.

Republican commission member Hans von Spakovsky was a Justice Department official in the Civil Rights Division under President GeorgeW. Bush and strongly argued against reauthoriz­ing the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

Connie Lawson, Indiana’s secretary of state, is proud of having co- written her state’s voter ID law that spread nationwide, even though the law has since suffered federal judicial defeats in Texas andWiscons­in ( 2011), and in North Carolina and North Dakota ( 2013).

Finally, while the commission’s goals have not been clearly stated, it seems obvious the real purpose of the commission is twofold: to validate Trump’s claim he would have won the popular vote in 2016 if not for illegal voters, and to lay the groundwork for nationaliz­ing voter- suppressio­n legislatio­n, making it more difficult for people of color, women, workers, young people, seniors and the disabled— traditiona­l Democratic constituen­cies — to vote.

Conclusion? The fraud commission is fraudulent!

 ?? | MARK WILSON/ GETTY IMAGES ?? Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach ( left) and Vice President Mike Pence attend the first meeting of the Presidenti­al Advisory Commission on Election Integrity on July 19 inWashingt­on, D. C.
| MARK WILSON/ GETTY IMAGES Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach ( left) and Vice President Mike Pence attend the first meeting of the Presidenti­al Advisory Commission on Election Integrity on July 19 inWashingt­on, D. C.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States