Chicago Sun-Times

No stopping Trump if he decides to push the button

- BY MURRAY POLNER Murray Polner is the author of “No Victory Parades: The Return of the Vietnam Veteran,” “Branch Rickey: A Biography,” and co- editor of “We Who Dared Say No To War.”

It is 4 o’clock in the morning in Washington and our president, whoever he or she may be, is awakened by a call from a Pentagon’s watch officer.

“Sir,” the Pentagon officer shrieks, “our computers show nukes heading for us! What’ll we do?”

Still sleepy and possibly disbelievi­ng the caller, but with less than 10 minutes to determine if it’s yet another nuclear false alarm — in the past, Moscow has had three and we’ve made the same number of mistakes — the president could choose to kiss his wife goodbye and do nothing.

Or, with unchecked legal power to do as he wishes, the president could order his commanders and nuclear subs to fire away.

The real question is whether any American president, now or in the future, can be stopped or delayed even though he or she has the sole right to decide when and if to start a nuclear war. I hold no brief for former Vice President Dick Cheney, but in 2008 he said — correctly, I believe — that a president “could launch a kind of devastatin­g attack the world’s never seen.”

“He doesn’t have to check with anybody,” Cheney said. “He doesn’t have to call the Congress. He doesn’t have to check with the courts. He has that authority because of the nature of the world we live in.”

Bruce Blair, a former nuclear launch officer who also once worked at the Brookings Institutio­n, put it this way: “There is no way to reverse the president’s order. And there would be no recalling missiles once launched.” In a 2016 article for Politico, Blair asked, “What Exactly Would It Mean to Have Trump’s Finger on the Nuclear Button?”

As Trump- hating Democrats and a small but growing number of Republican­s say, it is Trump’s unpredicta­ble mind and finger on that nuclear button.

In 1998, newly declassifi­ed U. S. documents revealed the Cold War secret that in late 1959, President Dwight Eisenhower had allowed certain senior commanders to make the decision to use nukes in specific demanding situations. These “predelegat­ions,” as they were called, would allow a rapid response by someone other than the president when the nation faced a much- feared Soviet Cold War nuclear attack.

Whether “predelegat­ions” still are in place remains a deep secret, but it is more than likely the Russians also have reciprocal predelegat­ions, especially since the dawn of Cold War 2 in Eastern Europe.

“There is no way to reverse the president’s order” to bomb away, says Blair, a co- founder of Global Zero, which favors nuclear abolition. And once the order is given, Blair adds, there is “no way of recalling missiles once launched.” Nor are there any “restraints that can prevent a willful president from unleashing this hell.”

Because 15 to 30 minutes would be the difference between life and death for millions of people, Blair is less worried about a president’s rash actions than about whether he could “really take command of the situation, exercise independen­t judgment and brake a runaway train.”

Some aspects of presidenti­al nuclear war- making powers remain top secret, hidden from the public. It is an arrangemen­t designed for rapid decisions, not for debate and deliberati­on. Until some alterna- tive remedy is developed, there is no perfect solution.

So here are a few words of warning to all of us from an old Army general named Omar Bradley:

“Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants. We know more about war than we know about peace, more about killing than we know about living.”

In late 1959, President Dwight Eisenhower had allowed certain senior commanders to make the decision to use nukes in specific demanding situations.

 ??  ?? MANUEL BALCE CENETA/ AP
MANUEL BALCE CENETA/ AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States