Chicago Sun-Times

PROTECT DRINKING WATER NEAR QUARRIES BEFORE THERE’ S A CRISIS

-

Illinois does not need another case of rubble trouble.

Last week, the Associated Press reported that 80 percent of old Illinois quarries that allow the dumping of concrete and other demolition waste have higher- thanaccept­able levels of toxins, according to state sampling results.

That’s a wake- up call. State authoritie­s had better take action before we have an environmen­tal disaster on our hands.

Spokesmen for industry argue that there is no reason for alarm because there is no sign of any health hazards— and Illinois has the strictest regulation­s in the nation for dumping “clean constructi­on and demolition debris” at sites other than landfills. Road builders, constructi­on companies and others who use the quarries say additional testing is unnecessar­y and too expensive.

But that overlooks a fundamenta­l rule when it comes to the threat of environmen­tal contaminat­ion: Always err on the side of caution. Once contaminan­ts get into the environmen­t, it is difficult and expensive— and sometimes impossible— to get them out. We should be bending over backward to keep our drinking water and the environmen­t acceptably clean, not responding to a crisis.

Most waste is hauled off to landfills, which are capped with soil and designed with liners to prevent toxic material from fouling the air or leaching into groundwate­r. But an exception is made for constructi­on material— lumber, bricks, broken concrete, etc.— that is considered “clean.” The exception— it can be dumped at a less sealed site— is made so that it does not fill up muchneeded landfill space, and because it doesn’t generally present an environmen­tal threat. Concrete is concrete.

But last spring, tests by the Illinois Environmen­tal Protection Agency found levels of arsenic, lead, mercury, atrazine and other heavy metals, pesticides and hazardous volatile organic compounds above permissibl­e limits at 80 percent of the 92 Illinois quarries that accept clean constructi­on debris. The former quarries, many of which are in Will County, often are directly above groundwate­r sources.

Dan Eichholz, executive director of the Illinois Associatio­n of Aggregate Producers, told the AP that the IEPA turned up no more contaminan­ts than you’d get if you tested “clean soil from backyards all around Illinois.”

Sounds good, sure. But too often, authoritie­s have ignored potential health risks until the cost of addressing them soared and people’s health was affected. Many Chicagoans still have raw memories of a pile of constructi­on debris and tainted material that grew into “The Mountain” in West Garfield Park in the 1990s. Residents of Flint, Michigan, also learned the danger of ignoring potential health risks when lead from old pipes and fixtures contaminat­ed their drinking water.

“This is a contaminat­ed drinking water problem waiting to happen,” said Howard A. Learner, president and executive director of the Environmen­tal Law & Policy Center. “There are sensible steps that should be taken at each of these sites.”

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan has filed a lawsuit that now is before the Illinois Appellate Court seeking to require groundwate­r monitoring at quarries that accept constructi­on debris, citing the risk of pollutants getting “directly into the water table.”

In the Legislatur­e, a coalition of environmen­talists, local officials, Madigan and others last spring blocked by one vote a law that would have eased liability and permitting requiremen­ts for quarry owners. But an environmen­tfriendly bill filed by state Rep. Margo McDermed, R- Mokena, that would have required groundwate­r monitoring at the quarries never made it out of committee.

McDermed said the recent IEPA testing showed the methods used to monitor constructi­on degree “were completely inadequate.”

It can cost five times as much to dispose of materials at a landfill as in a former quarry, which creates a big incentive to dump so- called clean constructi­on debris in quarries. But Henry Henderson, Midwest director of the Natural Resources Defense Council, cautions that “clean” debris is an inexact label. Much of it comes from the demolition of old buildings, he said, and it can include such contaminan­ts as metals and asbestos.

Moreover, tainted groundwate­r is particular­ly difficult to clean up once it has been tainted, Henderson said, pointing out that many communitie­s outside the Chicago area rely on groundwate­r for drinking water.

Dumping constructi­on debris in old quarries is not a bad idea. But an independen­t agency should monitor the material brought to those sites and the groundwate­r around them.

Preventive medicine is always best.

 ?? | CHARLES REX ARBOGAST/ AP ?? Chicago Street Clean Constructi­on Demolition Debris LLCmanager Bud Boyer stands on constructi­on asphalt waste that will be recycled into “clean” fill material at the company’s facility in Joliet.
| CHARLES REX ARBOGAST/ AP Chicago Street Clean Constructi­on Demolition Debris LLCmanager Bud Boyer stands on constructi­on asphalt waste that will be recycled into “clean” fill material at the company’s facility in Joliet.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States