Chicago Sun-Times

QUESTIONS AND FEW ANSWERS

City official says more will be revealed at later stage of project

- Email: rhinton@ suntimes. com Twitter: @ rrhinton BY RACHEL HINTON Staff Reporter

Delayed over a half- hour due to technical difficulti­es, the start of a federal review for the Obama Presidenti­al Center drew around 100 people to the South Shore YMCA Friday, but yielded few concrete answers.

After a presentati­on on the review process and timeline by Eleanor Gorski, deputy commission­er of the city’s Department of Planning and Developmen­t, representa­tives from around 50 community organizati­ons— called consulting parties — got the chance to ask questions.

Some asked about expanding the scope of the review — which currently encompasse­s all of Jackson Park and parts of the Midway Plaisance — to include the South Shore Cultural Center and the entirety of the Midway. Others asked what the community’s recourse might be if the center’s impact was found to be too adverse on the park.

Those questions would all be answered in due time, Gorski said.

“Stage three is the time to explore some of these concerns,” Gorski said. “The Section 106 process isn’t meant to stop projects, it’s meant to mitigate them and assess the effects so that the best project comes about for the community while acknowledg­ing that these projects are proposed and we need to address it.”

The review process is in stage two. Stage three, or the assessment of the adverse effects, isn’t likely to happen until spring or summer of next year. While the federal review proceeds, a review into the center’s adherence to the National Environmen­tal Protection Act is slated to start “soon,” Gorski said.

The federal process is reviewing areas of potential effects, focusing primarily on the archaeolog­y— which will include testing the soil of the park and looking at potential ground disturbanc­e— and the historic architectu­re of the proposed center’s land.

Michael McNamee, cochair of Save the Midway, said he sees the review as a welcome step forward. He was understand­ing of the delay in answers and appreciate­d the “transparen­cy of the process.”

“I’m glad this process is happening and that it seems comprehens­ive,” McNamee said. “As long as they’re really going to try to answer all of our questions and deal with everyone’s concerns about adverse impacts I think this will go well.”

The site proposal for the Obama Presidenti­al Center also includes plans for a PGA- level golf course, a controvers­ial move that would combine the Jackson Park and South Shore courses.

Juanita Irizarry, executive director of Friends of the Parks, found the session informativ­e, but with no concrete answers as to how the proposed golf course fits into the review process, she’s concerned the issue will slip under the radar.

“Whether this is about the Obama Center or the golf course or both is still unclear, and we’re concerned that this [ process] may not ask and answer enough questions,” Irizarry said. “So we seek further clarificat­ion on whether this study is going to raise up all of the questions and answers related to the proposed golf course.”

 ?? | FILES ?? A rendering of the Obama Presidenti­al Center.
| FILES A rendering of the Obama Presidenti­al Center.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States