Chicago Sun-Times

Dems weighed down by Madigan ‘ tax’

- RICH MILLER Rich Miller also publishes Capitol Fax, a daily political newsletter, and capitolfax.com.

Every election cycle, House Democratic candidates have to pay what can be thought of as a “Madigan Tax.”

The “tax” is the amount of extra campaign money, labor and ingenuity required to overcome the voting public’s strong negative perception of being in any way associated with House Speaker Michael Madigan.

The tax has always been imposed because Madigan has always been unpopular in this state. But the tax rate has risen over the years as Madigan’s familiarit­y and unpopulari­ty have grown.

Back in October 2012, a Chicago Tribune/ WGN- TV poll found that 38 percent of Illinoisan­s had no opinion either way about Madigan. Of those who did, 22 percent approved of his job performanc­e, compared with 40 percent who disapprove­d.

And then Bruce Rauner got into the game and his constant, wellfunded attacks on Madigan made the longtime House speaker much better known to the average voter.

Just 11 percent of voters had no opinion of Madigan in a 2017 poll taken for the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute. Not only did lots more voters know who Madigan was, they also despised him. Madigan’s disapprova­l rating was 61 percent in that poll, well above his 26 percent approval rating.

That could explain why Madigan’s House Democrats lost four net seats in 2016, despite a strong statewide win by Democratic presidenti­al candidate Hillary Clinton. Part of the blame can go to Donald Trump, who did well in Downstate areas held by Democrats, but a big reason was that the Madigan tax had become too high in those districts.

The # MeToo controvers­y swirling around Madigan these days has the potential to make that tax rate even more prohibitiv­e for Madigan’s operation. He’s taken two substantia­l hits over the past several days that might have sunk a lesser man. Madigan had to dump two top campaign advisers after # MeToo scandals, and more controvers­y is almost undoubtedl­y on the way.

While the focus should be on the victims, we cannot escape the political realities.

With that in mind, keep an eye on the 17th House District Democratic primary race on the tony North Shore. The district is currently represente­d by Rep. Laura Fine, D- Glenview, who is running unopposed in the Senate primary. Rep. Fine and several other local political leaders have endorsed Jennifer GongGersho­witz. But Candace Chow has enough money and support to compete.

Chow also has some very slick direct mailers.

“Candance Chow didn’t need Mike Madigan to get from a trailer park to Kellogg Business School,” declares her latest mail piece. “And she doesn’t need him now.” The front features a graduation cap on which somebody has taped the phrase “No Thx Mike.” Clever.

Chow’s campaign took a poll late last year that found 60 percent of the district’s likely Democratic voters ( not all voters, just Democratic voters) had an unfavorabl­e view of Madigan, while just 36 percent of Democrats viewed him favorably. 70 percent of the district’s Democrats expressed doubts about voting for a candidate who was backed by Madigan and his team.

Madigan has never played particular­ly well in that more liberal part of the world, and Chow’s mailer goes on to trash him further. “While others lean on Mike Madigan and Springfiel­d lobbyists, Candance Chow is the progressiv­e, independen­t Democrat, who will put our schools and our families first.”

Whatever happens, Chow’s attempt to turn Madigan’s already controvers­ial contributi­ons into fatal poison with the # MeToo issue is a first. And it might just spread. He could possibly wind up being “taxed” out of existence.

 ??  ?? Michael Madigan
Michael Madigan
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States