Chicago Sun-Times

Draw the line on gerrymande­ring

- MADELEINE DOUBEK Madeleine Doubek is policy & civic engagement director at the Better Government-Associatio­n.

Corruption is cemented in Illinois when politician­s draw political maps to protect their incumbents and their party’s chances of winning the most seats in an election.

Republican­s did it in Illinois after the 1990 Census, and Democrats have been doing it ever since because they’ve won control of the mapmaking process.

Maps drawn by political leaders result in far fewer competitiv­e and contested races, something you might notice when you cast your primary election ballot. In essence, your choices are being taken from you.

For years, hundreds of thousands of Illinois voters repeatedly have signed petitions to try to get a chance to weigh in on amore independen­t attempt at drawing political boundaries. And for years, House Speaker Michael Madigan’s lawyers have blocked every effort in court and won.

But there is another way to get redistrict­ing reform before the voters. Illinois lawmakers simply could vote themselves to directly put a question on the ballot, asking voters if they want to try to draw districts by a different method.

During the last election cycle, 105 Democrats and Republican­s in the Illinois House voted to do just that. They voted for putting an amendment to voters that would have turned over mapmaking not to political leaders but to a more independen­t commission whose members were to have been chosen by state Supreme Court justices.

That effort nevermade it to a ballot because the Illinois Senate voted, instead, on different mapmaking changes that kept the power in the hands of ruling politician­s. In a cynical ploy, Madigan and Illinois Senate President John Cullerton had the state Senate and House both take votes on different versions of mapmaking legislatio­n. That allowed lawmakers in each chamber to say they were in favor of redistrict­ing changes on the campaign trail without ever actually having to implement a new way.

The legislatio­n supported by 105 House lawmakers really was a solid attempt at more independen­t mapmaking. And so, a coalition of community and good- government groups, including the Better Government Associatio­n, used it as the model for a new mapmaking attempt now drafted, House Joint Resolution Constituti­onal Amendment 43.

The old amendment would have had Supreme Court justices naming eight people to an independen­t map commission from judicial districts around the state. HJRCA 43 has one court justice from each of the two major political parties naming 16 people to a commission: seven each from the two major parties and two independen­ts.

The commission would draft Illinois House and Senate maps, as well as congressio­nal district maps. A public website for the commission would be created, with all of their work and communicat­ion open to the public. All of their meetings would be livestream­ed and subject to the Freedom of Informatio­n and Open Meetings acts.

Where the previous legislativ­e attempt at independen­t redistrict­ing, HJRCA 58, called for 15 hearings before a map was proposed and five more afterward, the new plan calls for 20 public hearings before a map is proposed with 10 afterward.

Both attempts include language to meet federal voting rights requiremen­ts, protect racial and minority communitie­s, as well as common social and economic communitie­s.

HJRCA 43 would require commission­ers tomeet certain ethics and financial disclosure requiremen­ts, too.

Another census will be conducted in just a few years, and new maps are crafted after that. The governor, the attorney general, the senators and representa­tives we elect this year all could have a say in determinin­g whether we get a new chance at a fresh mapmaking approach. Do you know where your candidates stand?

Some of the governor candidates participat­ed in a redistrict­ing survey you can find at http://www.changeil.org/2018survey/. Governor candidates also were asked recently if they would veto amap produced by politician­s. State Sen. Dan Biss and Chris Kennedy would not commit to a veto pledge. All the answers are at Capitol Fax. The candidates for attorney general were asked what they were willing to do to push for a more independen­t map process. State Sen. Kwame Raoul said he supported politician-produced maps because he was concerned independen­t efforts would pack minorities together and dilute their voting strength. You can listen to the Democratic attorney general candidates’ answers at the BGA- ABC7 Chicago livestream and catch Republican­s Gary Grasso and Erika Harold at a similar livestream.

If your incumbent voted for HJRCA 58 a fewyears ago, is she or he willing to push for HJRCA 43 now? Will any challenger­s commit to supporting the new amendment? Ask them. Get as much informatio­n as you can before you vote. Let’s start holding all our politician­s accountabl­e. It’s time for an end to gerrymande­red political districts that set corruption into our system in stone.

 ?? | SETH PERLMAN/ AP FILE ?? Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan and Senate President John Cullerton
| SETH PERLMAN/ AP FILE Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan and Senate President John Cullerton
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States