Chicago Sun-Times

What Supreme Court’s ruling on sports betting means for Illinois

- MARK BROWN,

AU. S. Supreme Court ruling Monday that lifted a federal ban on sports betting could pave the way for some states to soon allow legal wagers, but Illinois gamblers should expect to stick with their bookies a while longer.

Several states had already passed laws clearing the way for sports betting in anticipati­on of Monday’s ruling in favor of the state of New Jersey, which had challenged the 1992 federal ban.

But in Illinois, sports betting proposals have been mired in the same stalemate that has blocked comprehens­ive gambling expansion efforts for years.

The question now is whether the money generated by sports betting could be the fresh ingredient that unlocks a broader deal between casino owners, communitie­s that want to add more casinos, horse racing interests that want their own slot machines, the fast- growing video gambling industry and the next big thing— online and mobile gambling. Throw daily fantasy sports into the mix for good measure.

In a state so heavily invested in other forms of gambling, there are numerous obstacles to sports betting advancing on its own merits. A Rockford legislator has already tied his sports gambling proposal to that city’s long- running bid for its own casino.

But Sen. Napoleon Harris, D- Harvey, a former NFL linebacker who has sponsored legislatio­n to legalize sports betting, says a stand- alone bill is exactly what he wants.

Harris’ proposal would allow Illinois casinos to offer in- person or online wagers on profession­al or college sports with the state taxing the proceeds.

Harris called it a “win- win situation” for the state and for sports fans who enjoy betting.

“You’ll have enough money to pay for a lot of things the state wants to pay for,” said Harris, while refusing to give an estimate of how much revenue sports betting could generate.

Others question how heavily the state could tax sports gambling if it hopes to lure bettors away froman entrenched illegal gambling scene. Deutsche Bank Market Research estimates the potential legalized sports betting market in Illinois at $ 681 million annually.

Harris would impose a 12.5 percent tax on gross sports wagering revenue and a 1 percent fee that would go to pro sports leagues and the NCAA, both of which he said are open to negotiatio­n.

The National Basketball Associatio­n and Major League Baseball have taken the lead in arguing they are entitled to such a payment.

They call it an “integrity fee”— in recognitio­n of the use of their intellectu­al property and the added cost of policing their sports to protect honest competitio­n.

Harris said the timing of the Supreme Court’s ruling caught legislator­s by surprise.

They had not expected the court to issue its opinion before the Legislatur­e’s scheduled adjournmen­t date at the end of themonth, which would have allowed legislator­s to negotiate the details of a bill over the summer.

Getting a deal done in the 16 legislativ­e days remaining on the calendar will be difficult, he allowed. As always, though, the biggest obstacle to legalized sports betting in Illinois won’t be gambling opponents so much as gambling industry competitor­s.

“By no means is this going to be simple and elegant,” said Rep. Mike Zalewski, DRiverside, the House sponsor of Harris’ bill.

Zalewski warned there’s a possibilit­y someone could try to step into the void created by the Supreme Court ruling and begin openly accepting sports bets in Illinois, challengin­g regulators to shut them down despite a state law that prohibits sports gambling.

That would be similar to the business model recently used by fantasy sports operators and market disrupters in other industries, he noted.

“We would be reckless if we didn’t try to get a law on the books as soon as possible,” Zalewski said.

One factor working in favor of legalized sports gambling is that none of the other players in the industry currently receive that revenue, he said.

With the political uncertaint­ies of an election year, however, it’s unclear whether Gov. Bruce Rauner and legislativ­e leaders will be in any big hurry to move a gambling bill.

THE BIGGEST OBSTACLE TO LEGALIZED SPORTS BETTING IN ILLINOIS WON’T BE GAMBLING OPPONENTS SO MUCH AS GAMBLING INDUSTRY COMPETITOR­S.

 ?? AP FILE PHOTO ?? People watch coverage of the first round of the NCAA men’s college basketball tournament this year at theWestgat­e Superbook sports book in Las Vegas. The Supreme Court on Monday struck down a federal law that bans gambling on sports in most states.
AP FILE PHOTO People watch coverage of the first round of the NCAA men’s college basketball tournament this year at theWestgat­e Superbook sports book in Las Vegas. The Supreme Court on Monday struck down a federal law that bans gambling on sports in most states.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States