Chicago Sun-Times

A posthumous pardon for the great boxer Jack Johnson is long overdue

-

Jack Johnson’s great crime, in the words of W. E. B. Du Bois, was his “unforgivab­le blackness.” And for that, Johnson, one of the greatest boxers of all time, was railroaded on trumped- up federal charges and locked away in prison for almost a year. White racist Americans couldn’t beat him in the boxing ring, as he defeated one “great white hope” after another, so they exacted their vengeance in a kangaroo court of law.

This was during the lynching era, to be sure. In the year Johnson was imprisoned, 1920, at least eight other African- American men were victims of racially motivated killings. But as we approach the 100th anniversar­y of this historic wrong against Johnson, our nation’s racial roiling continues still, creating a powerful argument for finally — if only symbolical­ly — setting things right.

President Donald Trump tweeted last month that he’s considerin­g granting a posthumous pardon to Johnson, at the urging of the actor Sylvester Stallone. We hope the president’s not feigning this time. We hope he follows through.

Let’s be blunt about Johnson’s failings as a man, black or white. President Barack Obama declined to pardon Johnson, and when his attorney general, Eric Holder, was pressed about why, Holder frankly admitted that Obama’s reluctance was entirely unrelated to Johnson’s wrongful conviction.

Johnson was “convicted unfairly,” Holder said in 2016, but there are “countervai­ling concerns about the way he treated women, physically treated women. So all of this has to be balanced before this president or his successor would make a determinat­ion that a pardon is appropriat­e.”

To our thinking, the task for Trump is to pardon Johnson in such a way that makes this distinctio­n clear — that the sole purpose is to reverse a historic racist injustice, and nothing more. A pardon need not, and must not, be seen as a kind of absolution for any other very real offense.

Johnson was convicted of taking a white girlfriend, whom he later married, across state lines. He was convicted under the Mann Act, a law meant to protect women against prostituti­on. The vaguely written law sometimes was used, as in Johnson’s case, simply to punish black men for the perceived sin of consorting with white women.

Johnson’s real offense was flouting convention­s about a black man’s “place” in early 20th century America. He dressed flashy, talked brashly, lived large and married three white women.

When a white cop once pulled him over for speeding and charged him $ 50, he gave the officer $ 100 and said it was payment in advance — because he was going to roar back later at the same speed.

Johnson, who died in 1946, is buried in Chicago’s Graceland Cemetery. Among those calling for his posthumous pardon are Sen. John McCain and the documentar­y filmmaker Ken Burns, whose two- part film about Johnson is titled “Unforgivab­le Blackness.”

A pardon for Johnson is only right and long overdue.

 ?? PROVIDED PHOTO ?? In 1912, while living on the South Side of Chicago, Jack Johnson was charged with violating the Mann Act, which made it illegal to transport women across state lines for “immoral” purposes. An all- white jury convicted him. Johnson said he’d been framed.
PROVIDED PHOTO In 1912, while living on the South Side of Chicago, Jack Johnson was charged with violating the Mann Act, which made it illegal to transport women across state lines for “immoral” purposes. An all- white jury convicted him. Johnson said he’d been framed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States