Chicago Sun-Times

BACKERS OF EASING SPRAY-PAINT BAN TRY LEGISLATIV­E SWITCH

- BY FRAN SPIELMAN, CITY HALL REPORTER fspielman@suntimes.com | @fspielman

Chicago’s 26-year-old ban on the retail sale of spray paint would be a ban no more for adults at the behest of its original sponsor to help retailers in border wards losing business to the suburbs.

But it didn’t happen Wednesday. Instead of approving the ordinance co-sponsored by Aldermen Edward Burke (14th) and Matt O’Shea (19th), the License Committee referred the two-year-old ordinance back to the Burke-chaired Finance Committee.

License Committee Chairman Emma Mitts (37th) said she handed off to Burke because he asked her to do so. She didn’t explain why.

O’Shea is hoping Wednesday’s legislativ­e switch sets the stage for passage of an ordinance that’s been stuck in committee for two years.

He argued that small business owners at True Value, Ace Hardware and other stores in his border ward are “getting crushed” by customers leaving the city.

“People are going to the suburbs right across the street from their locations. They can’t get spray paint there, so they’re not stopping there at all. They’ve asked me to help them,” O’Shea said.

O’Shea denied that relaxing the ban would be an open invitation to graffiti taggers.

“People who want to tag and spray paint — they’re gonna get their spray paint wherever they can. It doesn’t matter if they shop two blocks from their house or four miles from their house,” O’Shea said.

“If people want drugs, they’re gonna go outside their neighborho­od to get ’em. If people want alcohol, they’re gonna go outside their neighborho­od to get it.”

Retired Chicago Police lieutenant and anti-graffiti crusader Bob Angone said Burke and O’Shea are making a “colossal mistake” by pushing to allow adults to purchase spray paint.

“No signs in stores will stop those taggers. The ban helped keep Chicago the beautiful city it is. Something stinks here,” Angone wrote in an email Wednesday to the Chicago Sun-Times.

“Make no mistake that ban kept Chicago from being overrun with mindless graffiti. It cost the CTA millions and then spread to the neighborho­ods. What a few businesses will earn will cost taxpayers more millions in cleanup, cops time and it’s just plain ugly. It was a daily battle those aldermen don’t want to face.”

Under the watered-down ordinance now before the Finance Committee, Chicago retailers that choose to sell spray paint, broad-tipped markers and etching equipment would be required to display them in an area “not accessible to the general public without employee assistance.”

Those stores would also be required to post “cards in public view” that warn: “Vandalism is against the law and punishable by a fine of up to $2,500” and up to 30 days in jail.

In an apparent attempt to make the relaxed rules easier to swallow for those concerned that the changes would be an open invitation to taggers, Burke tossed in dramatical­ly higher fines for minors found in possession of “graffiti implements” and adults who aid and abet them.

Minors would face a $500 fine for each offense and three times that amount if they’re caught more than once in the same year. They also would be required to perform community service.

Adults who help them procure “graffiti implements” would face fines ranging from $500 to $1,500 for each offense.

 ?? PROVIDED PHOTO ?? A city worker cleans up graffiti. Chicago has had a 26-year ban on the retail sale of spray paint.
PROVIDED PHOTO A city worker cleans up graffiti. Chicago has had a 26-year ban on the retail sale of spray paint.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States