Chicago Sun-Times

RELATED SUN-TIMES EDITORIAL

-

CPS puts up a necessary new wall between teachers and kids on social media.

Chicago’s public school system is only doing what’s right in putting strict limits on teachers’ and students’ use of social media and text messaging to communicat­e.

Teachers and kids can’t “friend” each other on Facebook anymore, which probably wasn’t a good idea to begin with.

It’s regrettabl­e that it has to be this way. But if it prevents even one more case of child sexual abuse, it has to happen.

The Chicago Public Schools on Wednesday laid down the new rules in the wake of a Chicago Tribune investigat­ion into hundreds of cases of child sexual abuse over years, including CPS teachers who attempted to groom students for sexual relationsh­ips through text messaging.

The new rules make sense. From now on, teachers and coaches in the public schools cannot communicat­e with students on social media platforms such as Instagram and Snapchat. Text messaging between students and teachers also is banned — except for group communicat­ion and alerts approved by parents.

To send email to CPS staff members, students now must use a CPS-controlled system. Calls to staff members’ personal cell phones are prohibited.

Many workplaces have social media policies, and schools should be no different. From San Diego to Sarasota, Florida, school districts are establishi­ng rules as to how teachers and students can — and cannot — connect.

It is sad, in a way. We would love to live in a world in which such rules were not necessary. The vast majority of teachers and other employees in any school are there only because they want to be of help to young people. Social media and text messaging are good ways to be available to kids.

But we have been reminded over and over in recent months that we must do a better job of protecting children. In the last year alone, new child sexual abuse scandals also have been uncovered in youth volleyball, USA Gymnastics and the Catholic church in Pennsylvan­ia.

The Tribune reported cases of CPS teachers developing a rapport with targeted students by sending friendly text messages that later turned suggestive and even pornograph­ic.

Such predatory behavior, and repeated mishandlin­g of sexual abuse cases by school administra­tors, cried out for policy changes. An independen­t report by former federal prosecutor Maggie Hickey found “systemic deficienci­es” from top to bottom in the way CPS trained staff members and handled misconduct.

So we welcome the new ground rules. Yet, we recognize that students also will lose something: their ability to turn easily — and privately — to good and caring teachers and coaches for help.

Every day in Chicago, such exemplary teachers quietly counsel stressed, depressed, homeless and hungry children. They’ll still be able to connect with students the old-fashioned way, in person — or by CPS-monitored email — but that won’t come as naturally as texting for many kids today.

We know of many teachers and coaches who over the years have given students a hot meal, warm gloves or a ride to school now and then. They are mentors, and sometimes heroes.

Many high school coaches say it’s important that they can spend a good deal of time with their student-athletes to keep them off the streets and give them a break from unstable homes. They already feel hamstrung by Illinois High School Associatio­n rules that limit coaches to 25 days with studentath­letes in the summer.

Text messaging is a lifeline for players to stay in touch with coaches. Now they’re being told they can’t do that, except in rare circumstan­ces.

All the same, we believe the new CPS rules are entirely workable. Contact between teachers and students outside the classroom or away from the athletic field will simply require a few extra steps in a more structured system.

FROM NOW ON, TEACHERS AND COACHES IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS CANNOT COMMUNICAT­E WITH STUDENTS ON SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS SUCH AS INSTAGRAM AND SNAPCHAT. TEXT MESSAGING BETWEEN STUDENTS AND TEACHERS ALSO IS BANNED — EXCEPT FOR GROUP COMMUNICAT­ION AND ALERTS APPROVED BY PARENTS.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States