44 VIOLATIONS ON PROPERTY WHERE KIDS PERISHED
City cracks down on owner of Little Village building days after horrific fire
Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s administration on Friday threw the book at the owner of a Little Village building where 10 children died in a fire that was Chicago’s most deadly for children since the Our Lady of Angels fire in 1958.
The children — who were between three months and 16 years old — died in the rear coach house of a building at 2224 S. Sacramento owned by Merced Gutierrez.
A blitzkrieg investigation by the Chicago Department of Buildings’ Strategic Task Force found 38 violations in the front building, including missing or defective smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, defective light fixtures and armored cable and electrical wiring and plumbing installed without permits.
Other violations included: junk and debris obstructing exits; a basement container filled with gas; porch and exterior door defects; evidence of rodent and roach infestation; an attic full of junk and debris that posed a fire hazard; and improper clearance for electrical panels.
Six more violations were found during a separate inspection of the rear coach house.
Based on those violations, City Hall is seeking to secure the rear building, post a watchman on the premises between the hours of 4 p.m. and 8 a.m. and “repair or wreck” it so it does not pose a threat to neighboring residents.
Raul Serrato, an attorney representing Gutierrez, but not on the building code violations, questioned the timing of the city’s crackdown.
“I guess they want to cover their bases. They don’t want to be seen as maybe that they had a hand in it [by] not aggressively enforcing whatever they needed to enforce against my client,” Serrato said.
“The place is already burnt. There was a fire. It’s unoccupied. Now, you come in and make these citations? It’s totally unfair to my client.”
On the same day the 10th child died, Serrato told the Chicago Sun-Times that Gutierrez tried to evict Yolanda Ayala.
On Friday, Serrato disclosed that there was more to it than that.
“The reason why [my client] was trying to evict was because he was getting complaints from the alderman. The alderman had summoned him for what was alleged to be drug sales and gang activity at the property, so my client was then advised that he needed to abate the problem. The way to do that was to evict those tenants,” Serrato said.
Building Department spokesman Gregg Cunningham denied that going after Gutierrez now was the department’s way of covering itself for a failure to inspect more closely before the children died. Cunningham said that a more thorough inspection wasn’t possible before the fire.
“This is when inspectors were able to gain full access to the property,” he said. “In prior visits, there in response to 311 complaints, they were given partial access or, in some cases, no entry to parts of the building.
“When the inspectors come out there, they can only get access to the areas they’re given access to from a person on site. If they can’t gain entrance or access to certain parts of the building, they can’t inspect it.”
Ald. George Cardenas (12th) has acknowledged that his staff had been working with Gutierrez “for years” to correct a host of violations.
On Friday, Cardenas was asked whether the laundry list of violations uncovered by the Strategic Task Force after the fact were proof that City Hall could have done more to prevent the fire.
“I looked at the 311 [calls]. They said they did not have access to the building. Maybe that’s part of the problem. Monday morning quarterbacking is easy. But if you don’t have access to the building and nobody is really on the other end pushing this to an emergency and saying, ‘You need to get out here. I’m calling the police to get access,’ it makes it more difficult,” Cardenas said.
“I don’t think they dropped the ball. A better job could have been done of trying to get access. That I give you. But you try to manage this the best way you can. It’s a tragedy. No doubt about it. I’m heartbroken. You could always improve the process.”
The last inspection prior to this week occurred June 8 in response to a tenant complaint. The building was cited for two electrical violations — one for grounding in the front of the building and one for an illegal electrical cord going from the front building to the coach house. A court date was set for Sept. 24.
After the June 8 inspection, City Hall determined that the electrical violations were not serious enough to warrant vacating the building. Other contributing factors would have had to have been present to warrant vacating the building, official said.