Preckwinkle touts balanced forest budget, concedes district not out of the woods
Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle said Tuesday she “remains serious and committed” to making sure the Forest Preserves have the money to grow — even though she nixed a proposed referendum that would’ve let residents decide whether that commitment should include a property tax increase.
The increase was described as adding less than $5 a year to the property tax bill for a $100,000 home, but Preckwinkle said “now is not the time.”
Despite presenting a balanced $124 million 2020 budget for the nearly 70,000acre Cook County Forest Preserve District, Preckwinkle acknowledged the budget doesn’t “fully address the long-term fiscal challenges ahead.”
“We’re cognizant of the current atmosphere facing Cook County taxpayers, and it goes without saying there’s a great sensitivity to any potential levy increase,” Preckwinkle said. “But let me be abundantly clear: we remain serious and committed to helping the forest preserves, and we will do everything in our power to help prioritize their needs and help them find viable long term solutions that will benefit all Cook County residents.”
One of those long-term solutions would’ve been a referendum item on the March 2020 ballot, asking voters if they would support a 0.025% bump in the property tax levy “for the purposes of conserving and restoring land, protecting the water quality of rivers, lakes, and streams, providing outdoor programs for children,” and other matters for which the Forest Preserve bears some responsibility.
That increase would mean that 0.079% of taxes paid would go to the county’s growing preserve district. For a $100,000 home, the additional cost would have been around $4.78, according to the language of the referendum.
Cook County Commissioner Larry Suffredin, who championed the ballot measure and was prepared to bring it before the Forest Preserve Board on Tuesday, said he’d worked on shoring up support for it for four months.
At the “high-water mark” last week, Suffredin said he had 16 votes on the 17-member board.
When Preckwinkle pulled her support from the measure over the weekend, that support dwindled to five.
Suffredin sounded the fiscal alarm. “The year after this, we’re in trouble,” he said.
“With no money, we’re going to go backward. We may be put in the position where we’d have to sell land,” instead of acquiring it, Suffredin said.
The County Board doubles as the board of the forest preserve district, but because the preserves are a non-home rule entity, commissioners’ powers are limited. That means they can do little to raise the revenue needed to continue acquiring land and managing the preserves. Beyond letting the voters decide, the board could go to the Illinois General Assembly and ask legislators for help. The last time that happened was in 2004.
In a statement, Preckwinkle said during her time at the helm of the county, she has worked with “the limited resources available to make necessary Forest Preserve improvements and enhancements.”
“Commissioners and my office ultimately determined now is not the time for this potential measure, but we will continue exploring all options,” Preckwinkle’s statement continued.
Suffredin said he was disappointed about the withdrawal of support but said he knows Preckwinkle “agonized” over the decision. He said he will continue to advocate for the referendum item.
“She and I are on the same page,” Suffredin said. “We disagree — I would like to go forward because I would like the people to tell us what they believe we should be doing, but we both understand the need for resources to meet the mission of the forest preserve.”
Preckwinkle has some reason to be wary of tax increases.
The county’s penny-per-ounce sweetened beverage tax was the last time the county tried to implement a new levy on taxpayers. The Preckwinkle-championed initiative sparked a court challenge, heavily funded campaigns from outside groups both for and against — and a rare County Board revolt.
The pop tax went into effect in the summer of 2017 but was repealed in October of that year after residents expressed outrage. The repeal created a roughly $200 million gap in the 2018 budget that was filled by a layoffs, closing vacant positions and furlough days.