Chicago Sun-Times

Fighting back against the fake claim of ‘fake news’

- NATALIE Y. MOORE @natalieymo­ore

President Donald Trump succeeded. His co-opting of the phrase “fake news” has wormed its way into everyday language. “Fake news” no longer exclusivel­y refers to informatio­n that’s a hoax.

My first encounter with the idea of fake news was as a child glancing askance at supermarke­t tabloids as my mother stood in the grocery line. The garish headlines about alien abductions, salacious celebrity lies and half-human babies born come to mind. Years later, I found fake news could be biting satire and enjoyable, as The Onion perfected. Stephen Colbert elevated the concept on his latenight spoof show, “The Colbert Report,” on Comedy Central.

Today the free press in the U.S. is Trump’s declared enemy. His war is dangerous to the public and democracy, as he has turned the unabashedl­y biased Fox News into a personal megaphone and defacto state television. (If you are at home on isolation, I recommend watching Showtime’s summer 2019 miniseries “The Loudest Voice” about Fox News and Roger Ailes’ political agenda to distort the news.)

To Trump, “fake news” is a pugilistic response to anything he disagrees with. He aim is to discredit the press, deflect criticism and sow discontent. As a reality television star, Trump knows how to conquer mass media — from television to Twitter.

In “Audience of One: Donald Trump, Television, and the Fracturing of America,” author James Poniewozik traces how Trump rebranded “fake news” to fit his plot line.

“Like ‘Make America Great Again,’ ‘fake news’ meant whatever you needed it to be. At first it was a literal denial — ‘This news is untrue’ — but it quickly entered the half-literal, pro-wrestling kayfabeosp­here of so many Trumpisms,” Poniewozik writes in his book. “Maybe it meant the news was true but unfair. Or it was true but disrespect­ful.”

Trump found a winning formula. After he won the White House, he continued his approach. Any news reports that don’t fawn over him are labeled “fake.” Including true and accurate news reports on the cusp of a pandemic.

On March 9, Trump tweeted this: “The Fake News Media and their partner, the Democrat Party, is doing everything within its semiconsid­erable power (it used to be greater!) to inflame the CoronaViru­s

situation, far beyond what the facts would warrant. Surgeon General, ‘The risk is low to the average American.’”

I don’t pretend to know what’s in Trump’s head or heart. Honestly, that doesn’t matter to me. But I do know that statement is a public health disaster. And those statements seep into the general public. People didn’t want to accept that the coronaviru­s was on its way to torpedo this country. It’s easier to dismiss something you don’t agree with as “fake.”

Same playbook as Trump.

Truthfully, my concern about “fake news” predates our global public health scare. Over the past few years, I’ve noticed people of different political stripes use the phrase when they disagree with something. It could be as minor as a meme, a comment about a sports figure or pop culture star. “Fake news” is a defense mechanism, often done without major consequenc­es, but its origins go back to trying to undermine journalism. Saying the phrase repeatedly, even in a different context, damages.

No doubt, journalism deserves criticism and cynicism. Our industry is far from perfect. But just as a broad term like “the media,” which technicall­y means anything from film to tabloids to pop music to public media, dilutes, so does “fake news.” People are mimicking a president who doesn’t value accountabl­e journalism.

The News Literacy Project is a nonpartisa­n nonprofit that teaches media literacy to students in the digital age. I have volunteere­d in Chicago classrooms to help middlescho­olers decipher what is truly real and fake. I asked Peter Adams, senior vice president of education, what he thinks of “fake news.”

“While it began as a helpful term to describe a particular kind of misinforma­tion, it’s been weaponized and politicize­d as a catchall to refer to misinforma­tion,” Adams said. “We really try to help educators push past that term and think about the different kind of informatio­n like pieces of false informatio­n.”

If you really break down the meaning of “fake news,” you will see it is an oxymoron. If it’s fake, it is not news.

ON MARCH 9, TRUMP TWEETED THIS: “THE FAKE NEWS MEDIA AND THEIR PARTNER, THE DEMOCRAT PARTY, IS DOING EVERYTHING WITHIN ITS SEMI-CONSIDERAB­LE POWER (IT USED

TO BE GREATER!) TO INFLAME THE CORONAVIRU­S SITUATION, FAR BEYOND WHAT THE FACTS WOULD WARRANT. SURGEON GENERAL, ‘THE RISK IS LOW TO THE AVERAGE AMERICAN.’”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States