Chicago Sun-Times

STATES ON HOOK FOR BILLIONS UNDER TRUMP’S BENEFIT PLAN

- BY MATTHEW BARAKAT

FALLS CHURCH, Va. — Whether President Donald Trump has the constituti­onal authority to extend federal unemployme­nt benefits by executive order remains unclear. Equally up in the air is whether states, which are necessary partners in Trump’s plan to bypass Congress, will sign on.

Trump announced an executive order Saturday that extends additional unemployme­nt payments of $400 a week to help cushion the economic fallout of the pandemic. Congress had approved payments of $600 a week at the outset of the coronaviru­s outbreak, but those benefits expired Aug. 1 and Congress has been unable to agree on an extension. Many Republican­s have expressed concern that a $600 weekly benefit, on top of existing state benefits, gives people an incentive to stay unemployed.

But under Trump’s plan, the $400 a week requires a state to commit to providing $100.

Many states are already facing budget crunches caused by the pandemic. Asked at a news conference how many governors had signed on to participat­e, Trump answered: “If they don’t, they don’t. That’s up to them.”

Aubrey Layne, secretary of finance for Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam, a Democrat, said in a phone interview Sunday he believes it would be feasible for Virginia to participat­e in such a program if states are allowed to use money that’s been allocated to them under the already passed CARES Act. He said his preliminar­y understand­ing is that states can do so, but he and others are waiting to see the rules published.

The better solution, Layne said, would be for Congress to pass legislatio­n.

“It’s ludicrous to me that Congress can’t get together on this,” he said. “I think it would have been better for the president to use his influence in those negotiatio­ns, rather than standing on the sideline and then riding in like a shining knight.”

Indeed, details about the program became confused on Sunday. On CNN’s “State of the Nation,” White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow said conflictin­g things about whether the federal money was contingent on an additional contributi­on from the states. Initially Kudlow said that “for an extra $100, we will lever it up. We will pay three-quarters, and the states will pay 25%.” In the same interview, though, he later said that “at a minimum, we will put in 300 bucks … but I think all they [the states] have to do is put up an extra dollar, and we will be able to throw in the extra $100.”

A clarifying statement from the White House said the “funds will be available for those who qualify by, among other things, receiving $100/week of existing assistance and certify that they have lost their jobs due to COVID-19.”

Several advocacy groups that follow the issue, though, said it’s clear the way the executive order is structured that the federal money will be contingent on states making a 25% contributi­on.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, called the plan “an impossibil­ity.”

“I don’t know if the president is genuine in thinking the executive order is a resolution or if this is just a tactic in the negotiatio­n,” Cuomo said. “But this is irreconcil­able for the state. And I expect this is just a chapter in the book of Washington COVID mismanagem­ent.”

 ?? EVAN VUCCI/AP FILE ?? White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow said conflictin­g things Sunday about whether a federal jobless benefit is contingent on an additional contributi­on from the states.
EVAN VUCCI/AP FILE White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow said conflictin­g things Sunday about whether a federal jobless benefit is contingent on an additional contributi­on from the states.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States