Chicago Sun-Times

PRITZKER SIGNS FIREFIGHTE­R PENSION FIX THAT LIGHTFOOT CALLS ‘FISCALLY IRRESPONSI­BLE’

Pritzker signs bill for firefighte­rs that Lightfoot blasts as ‘fiscally irresponsi­ble’ product of ‘cutting backroom deals’

- RACHEL HINTON REPORTS,

Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed a bill aimed at fixing pensions for thousands of Chicago firefighte­rs on Monday, rejecting Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s call to veto the legislatio­n that she called “highly problemati­c.”

The governor argued the pension fix ensures “certainty and fair treatment” for hardworkin­g firefighte­rs, but Republican lawmakers and fellow Democrat Lightfoot counter that it will sock already strapped taxpayers with another property tax increase.

The new law removes the “birth date restrictio­n” that prohibited roughly 2,200 active and retired firefighte­rs born after Jan. 1, 1966, from receiving a 3% annual cost-ofliving increase.

Instead, those firefighte­rs got half that amount, 1.5% — and it is not compounded.

Pritzker said he’s “always believed that hardworkin­g men and women who have earned their pension shouldn’t pay the price for local or state budget challenges.”

In his statement, the governor said the new law “creates a system that gives all firefighte­rs certainty and fair treatment. And to make sure that the city can meet its obligation­s, my administra­tion is working to sell the James R. Thompson Center, which will return to the city’s property tax rolls and is projected to generate $45 million annually for the city and its sister agencies.”

Lightfoot issued her own statement, saying she was “disappoint­ed” that Pritzker signed “a bill that will result in a deeper financial burden to the taxpayers of Chicago.”

While first responders deserve to be “appropriat­ely compensate­d for their work both now and into retirement” signing off on this “unfunded mandate into law is the exact wrong way to accomplish this goal,” the mayor’s statement continued.

“A key missing element is an accompanyi­ng revenue stream from Springfiel­d to pay for this $18-30 million annual new financial obligation,” Lightfoot said. “This bill is fiscally irresponsi­ble and validates a Springfiel­d practice of cutting back-room deals without full transparen­cy and debate.

“As mayor, I have a responsibi­lity to ensure a stable financial future for our city, and this bill substantia­lly undercuts those efforts. This is a time where we must continue to be hyper-diligent around our present and future financial wellbeing.

Springfiel­d must start listening to cities.”

Back in February, the mayor sent Pritzker a letter urging him to veto the bill, arguing that it’s “highly problemati­c to implement this change at a time when 10 percent of Chicagoans have lost their jobs, many of whom have faced difficulty putting food on the table and are housing insecure.”

“This huge increase in unfunded liabilitie­s would necessaril­y mean another property tax hike for Chicagoans, which would regrettabl­y add to the overwhelmi­ng economic duress that so many or our neighbors are facing,” Lightfoot wrote at the time.

Lightfoot’s $12.8 billion budget for the fiscal year includes a $94 million property tax increase, followed by annual increases tied to the consumer price index.

State Sen. Robert Martwick — a frequent foe of Lightfoot’s — introduced the legislatio­n, which was passed with few hours remaining in the General Assembly’s January lame-duck session.

The Northwest Side Democrat told the Sun-Times the bill actually protects taxpayers by forcing city officials to face and deal with unpleasant realities.

The city is “sprinting towards the edge of the cliff with no idea how to slow down,” Martwick said. He cautioned that the “best thing for taxpayers is — always has been, and always will be — confrontin­g your problems as they exist and not kicking the can down the road.”

“What this bill does is it makes the city confront necessary, albeit really difficult, decisions about what they need to do with their finances, so that they can live up to the commitment to fund their pensions properly,” Martwick said.

“The firefighte­r fund sits at 17% funded, functional­ly almost insolvent,” he said. “If you’re looking to protect taxpayers, the best thing that you can do for them is stop the practices that put you in this big fiscal hole in the first place. In other words, you know you’re going to be on the hook for these benefits, you might as well put the money in timely.”

But Republican­s agreed with Lightfoot.

“Chicago taxpayers are on the hook for an additional $850 million thanks to Governor Pritzker signing HB2451 into law today,” House Deputy Minority Leader Tom Demmer, R-Dixon, said in a statement. “As if the $44 billion in pension debt they already owe wasn’t enough, today’s action by Governor Pritzker makes a property tax increase inevitable.

“Further, the Governor continues his bad habit of spending hypothetic­al revenue by suggesting that the sale of the James R. Thompson Center will be the magic cure for yet another financial problem.”

“THIS BILL IS FISCALLY IRRESPONSI­BLE AND VALIDATES A SPRINGFIEL­D PRACTICE OF CUTTING BACK-ROOM DEALS WITHOUT FULL TRANSPAREN­CY AND DEBATE.” MAYOR LORI LIGHTFOOT

“HARDWORKIN­G MEN AND WOMEN WHO HAVE EARNED THEIR PENSION SHOULDN’T PAY THE PRICE FOR LOCAL OR STATE BUDGET CHALLENGES.”

GOV. J.B. PRITZKER

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States