Chicago Sun-Times

LEGAL EXPERTS MAKE A CASE FOR INTENT IN WAUKESHA PARADE CRASH

- BY TAMMY WEBBER, TODD RICHMOND AND BERNARD CONDON

The man accused of plowing his SUV into a parade of Christmas marchers could have turned down a side street but didn’t. Once he passed it, he never touched the brakes — barreling through and leaving bodies in his wake, according to a criminal complaint.

No motive has been given for Darrell Brooks Jr., the suspect in the suburban Milwaukee crash Sunday that killed six people and injured more than 60 others, but it may not matter if he goes to trial. Legal experts say the evidence strongly supports intentiona­l homicide charges that would mean life in prison.

Former Waukesha County District Attorney Paul Bucher said it might be difficult to prove intent with the first person Brooks struck, “but when he kept going and knowing what he had done to the first person and didn’t stop, then it was all intentiona­l.”

Brooks, 39, is charged with five counts of first-degree intentiona­l homicide and is expected to face a sixth count after an 8-year-old boy died Tuesday. Waukesha County District Attorney Susan Opper has also said additional charges are likely.

Brooks’ attorneys, Jeremy Perri and Anna Kees, cautioned people not to judge the case before all facts are known.

“It’s essential that we not rush to judgment and instead treat these proceeding­s and all those involved with dignity and respect,” they said in a statement.

“That includes Mr. Brooks, who is entitled to a vigorous defense and careful protection of his Constituti­onal rights. No matter how serious and emotional the charges, until the government proves its allegation­s beyond a reasonable doubt, our client is presumed innocent.”

Opper said Wednesday her office would not comment on a pending case.

Brooks is accused of refusing to stop even as an officer banged on the hood of his SUV. Another officer fired three shots into the vehicle, but it did not stop.

Five people ranging in age from 52 to 81 were pronounced dead within hours. One of many injured children, Jackson Sparks, 8, died on Tuesday. Representa­tives for area hospitals said Wednesday that at least 16 people are being treated for injuries.

Brooks hasn’t spoken publicly, and it’s not known what, if anything, he told investigat­ors.

But even if Brooks was under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time — and police have not said he was — that could not be used as a defense in Wisconsin, experts said.

Tom Grieve, a Brookfield defense attorney and former Waukesha County prosecutor, said one possible defense would be that Brooks was suffering from a mental disease or defect. A jury would have to decide if he was guilty of the charges and then whether he was mentally ill. Such a finding would likely land him in a mental institutio­n rather than prison.

Opper could have charged Brooks with first-degree reckless homicide, which would have been a “slam dunk” conviction that, given Brooks’ age, would have been an effective life sentence, Bucher said. But extensive video and other evidence also support the more serious charge, he and other experts said.

“The fact he didn’t step on the brakes: That was intentiona­l. The fact that his foot was on the gas: That was intentiona­l. He could have stopped. … He’s the only person who could put his foot on the brake pedal, and he didn’t,” Grieve said.

A criminal complaint detailing the charges includes statements from police officers and witnesses who said the vehicle “appeared to be intentiona­lly moving side to side,” with no attempt to slow down or stop as it struck multiple people and sent bodies and objects flying.

One officer who tried to stop the vehicle said Brooks was looking directly at him, and it appeared he had no emotion on his face, the complaint said.

Prosecutor­s would not be allowed to put police or bystanders on the stand to speculate on what Brooks intended to do or his state of mind, experts said.

Bucher said prosecutor­s also would not be able to introduce social media posts made by Brooks, an aspiring rapper, or lyrics from his songs suggesting an interest in violence — which became the subject of widespread speculatio­n on social media that Brooks’ actions were intentiona­l.

Brooks, who has been charged with crimes more than a dozen times since 1999, had two outstandin­g cases against him at the time of the parade disaster, including one earlier in November in which he’s accused of intentiona­lly striking a woman with his car in Milwaukee County. He had been free on $1,000 bail for that case, which prosecutor­s now say was inappropri­ately low.

And on Sunday, Brooks was leaving the scene of a domestic dispute that had taken place just minutes before he drove into the parade route, Waukesha Police Chief Dan Thompson said.

Several experts predicted a plea deal.

“If I were in this case, what I’d be trying to do was to see how I can put out this fire as quickly as possible,” said Phil Turner, a former federal prosecutor who now works in private practice in Chicago. “If you let it linger, it’s only going to get worse.”

 ?? MARK HOFFMAN/MILWAUKEE JOURNAL-SENTINEL VIA AP ?? ABOVE: Darrell Brooks Jr. is escorted out of the courtroom Tuesday after making his initial appearance in Waukesha County Court in Waukesha, Wisconsin.
MARK HOFFMAN/MILWAUKEE JOURNAL-SENTINEL VIA AP ABOVE: Darrell Brooks Jr. is escorted out of the courtroom Tuesday after making his initial appearance in Waukesha County Court in Waukesha, Wisconsin.
 ?? CITY OF WAUKESHA/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES ?? LEFT: This image taken from a Facebook livestream by the city of Waukesha shows a red SUV speeding through the holiday parade crowd in Waukesha on Sunday.
CITY OF WAUKESHA/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES LEFT: This image taken from a Facebook livestream by the city of Waukesha shows a red SUV speeding through the holiday parade crowd in Waukesha on Sunday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States