Chicago Sun-Times

Gun-makers can’t avoid their role in gun violence

- BY SELWYN ROGERS, M.D. Selwyn Rogers, M.D., is the director of the University of Chicago Trauma Center. He is also a board member of Chicago CRED and the Institute for Nonviolenc­e Chicago. The views and opinions expressed by contributo­rs are their own an

Do corporatio­ns have a responsibi­lity to society if their products are being misused and causing extreme harm? We have faced this question before. In 1965, activist Ralph Nader wrote a book critiquing the auto industry’s safety record. In response, Congress passed a law that led to major improvemen­ts in car safety.

Today, the same question arises regarding the gun industry. Gun manufactur­er Glock produces a popular handgun that is easily converted to an illegal automatic weapon capable of firing up to 1,200 bullets per minute. Police in Chicago and elsewhere are seeing more and more of these guns in our streets, churches, parades, grocery stores, streets, homes, essentiall­y everywhere.

At the University of Chicago Medicine Trauma Center where I work, we are seeing more and more victims with multiple gunshot wounds. Most of them are young Black males caught in the web of limited opportunit­ies, structural violence and the illegal economy.

We may soon find out if Glock has any responsibi­lity to stop the illegal conversion­s of its guns. The city of Chicago is suing the company under a new state law aimed at holding the gun industry accountabl­e.

I salute the city and the state for these efforts, but I’m not holding my breath. Historical­ly, the courts have favored gun-makers over gun safety and have interprete­d the Second Amendment to basically allow anyone to own weapons of war.

The sheer number of guns in America — estimated around 400 million — means that laws and lawsuits will do little to reduce the scourge of gun violence. The clear message from the gun industry is, our products are legal, so deal with it.

We, along with our colleagues in other Level One trauma centers, deal with it every day. Five years ago, we opened the first trauma center on Chicago’s South Side. Since then, we have treated over 22,000 patients, including almost 8,000 with gunshot wounds.

And it’s not the only thing Chicago is doing. Today, thanks to an extraordin­ary partnershi­p of philanthro­py, government and business, a network of about two dozen community organizati­ons is directly intervenin­g to stop gun violence.

Community violence interventi­on organizati­ons hire individual­s with the trust, respect and credibilit­y necessary to engage directly with young people at the highest risk of shooting or being shot. They recruit participan­ts into programs offering support, trauma treatment, education, job training and a path into the legal economy. Collective­ly, these organizati­ons in Chicago serve thousands of young people in dozens of neighborho­ods.

So yes, Chicago is dealing with the consequenc­es of gun violence in numerous creative and aspiration­al ways. But what about the gun industry? What is their responsibi­lity?

In this era of smartphone­s, space travel and artificial intelligen­ce, gun manufactur­ers can make guns safer with, for instance, technology to keep anyone but the gun owner from firing a weapon. Can they make a gun that cannot be modified into a weapon of war?

We are all at risk from gun-makers’ failure to act, including police, who are expected to arrest individual­s armed with automatic weapons. The only winners in the arms race are the gun manufactur­ers.

This problem is not limited to cities like Chicago. In fact, the highest per capita murder rates are in southern and western states like Louisiana, Mississipp­i, Alabama and New Mexico.

It may be naive to think Glock would voluntaril­y modify its products to make them safer. It may be wishful thinking to believe the broader gun industry would hold itself accountabl­e for the safety of its products. I don’t know if public pressure would prompt action.

But I do know this. Gun violence claims over 40,000 American lives every year, including thousands of children. Firearm-related injuries are now the leading cause of death of children and adolescent­s.

As more and more of us recognize the staggering­ly high costs of gun violence, my hope is we unite behind a broad range of efforts to make our world safer.

Ideally, it would also include gun manufactur­ers with a conscience.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States