Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

Protecting access

-

Leaked documents and scientific­ally inaccurate statements during Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmati­on hearing suggest that he is likely to vote to dismantle Roe v. Wade should he be confirmed to the Supreme Court, giving heightened attention to the future of abortion access in the United States.

As we approach the anniversar­y of the Hyde Amendment — the federal ban on abortion coverage in Medicaid originally sponsored by U.S. Rep. Henry Hyde in 1976 — we clearly see the harms of restricted access. In particular, bans on abortion coverage force people to delay care, stop individual­s from getting the care they need and push people deeper into poverty. Influenced by broader social and economic disparitie­s in the U.S., unintended pregnancy and abortion are disproport­ionately experience­d by low-income women and women of color. Thus, coverage restrictio­ns can both widen health disparitie­s and create unequal access to safe abortion care. Moreover, these bans further stigmatize abortion care — care that 1 in 4 women decide is best for themselves and their families.

And despite persistent reproducti­ve health inequities, lawmakers at the federal level have sought to increase abortion restrictio­ns, as well as reduce funding for comprehens­ive sex education and threaten funding for contracept­ion and family planning services, all with little progress on policies that would support parenthood such as paid family leave, affordable child care and robust health insurance plans.

Last year, Illinois took an important step toward ensuring that all women have the ability to make the reproducti­ve health decisions that are best for them and their families. Lawmakers passed legislatio­n that removed restrictio­ns on abortion coverage within Medicaid and other state-based insurance plans, recognizin­g that abortion is necessary health care for many women and access should not be limited by income.

Just as Illinois removed restrictio­ns on coverage for abortion, lawmakers in Congress can do the same at the federal level. At a time when safe and legal abortion is getting harder to access, someone’s income should not be an additional barrier. All individual­s should be able to make decisions about their health and future with dignity and economic security.

— Lee Hasselbach­er, senior policy researcher, Center for Interdisci­plinary Inquiry and Innovation in Sexual and Reproducti­ve Health, University of Chicago, Chicago

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States