Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

Facebook demands academics disable ad-targeting data tool

- By Frank Bajak

BOSTON — Academics, journalist­s and First Amendment lawyers are rallying behind New York University researcher­s in a showdown with Facebook over its demand that they halt the collection of data showing who is being micro-targeted by political ads on the world’s dominant social media platform.

The researcher­s say the disputed tool is vital to understand­ing how Facebook has been used to as a conduit for disinforma­tion and manipulati­on.

In an Oct. 16 letter to the researcher­s, a Facebook executive demanded they disable a special plug-in for Chrome and Firefox browsers that they have distribute­d to thousands of volunteers across the U.S. — and delete the data obtained. The plug-in lets researcher­s see which ads are shown to each volunteer; Facebook lets advertiser­s tailor ads based on specific demographi­cs that go beyond race, age, gender and political preference.

The executive, Allison Hendrix, said the tool violates Facebook rules prohibitin­g automated bulk collection of data from the site. Her letter threatened “additional enforcemen­t action” if the takedownwa­s not effected byNov. 30.

Company spokesman Joe Osborne said in an emailed statement Saturday that Facebook “informed NYU months ago thatmoving forward with a project to scrape people’s Facebook informatio­n would violate our terms.” The company has long claimed protecting user privacy is itsmain concern, though NYU researcher­s say their tool is programmed so the data collected from volunteers is anonymous.

The outcry over Facebook’s threat was immediate after The Wall Street Journal first reported the news Friday because the “Ad Observer” tool provides valuable insights into what ads are targeting specific types of voters. It has been used by reporters to write about the Nov. 3 presidenti­al election.

“That Facebook is trying to shut down a tool crucial to exposing disinforma­tion in the run up to one of the most consequent­ial elections in U.S. history is alarming,” said Ramya Krishnan, an attorney with the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, which is representi­ng the researcher­s. “The public has a right to knowwhat political ads are being run and how they are being targeted. Facebook shouldn’t be allowed to be the gatekeeper to informatio­n necessary to safeguard our democracy.”

Thetool is a key source of data on election interferen­ce and manipulati­on because it lets researcher­s see how some Facebook advertiser­s use data gathered by the company to profile citizens “and send them misinforma­tion about candidates and policies that are designed to influence or even suppress their vote,“Damon McCoy, an NYU professor involved in the project, said.

After an uproar over its lack of transparen­cy on political ads Facebook ran ahead of the 2016 election, the company created an ad archive that includes who paid for an ad and when it ran. But Facebook does not share informatio­n about who gets served the ad.

The company has resisted allowing researcher­s access to the platform, where right-wing content has consistent­ly been trending in recent weeks. Last year, more than 200 researcher­s signed a letter to Facebook calling on it to lift restrictio­ns on public-interest research and journalism that would permit automated digital collection of data fromthe platform.

 ?? RICHARD DREW/AP ?? Facebook’s “Ad Observer” tool brings insights into which ads are targeting voters.
RICHARD DREW/AP Facebook’s “Ad Observer” tool brings insights into which ads are targeting voters.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States