Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

The real causes of the border crisis — and the real remedies

- Steve Chapman Steve Chapman, a member of the Tribune Editorial Board, blogs at www.chicagotri­bune.com/chapman. schapman@chicagotri­bune.com Twitter @SteveChapm­an13

In 2014, the Obama administra­tion was faced with a surge in unaccompan­ied minors from Central America showing up at our border and seeking asylum. In an effort to reduce the number of kids trekking across Mexico, it created a program to let them apply for asylum in their home countries. Some 13,000 did, helping to ease the crush.

You can guess what happened next. Donald Trump became president and acted on his twin beliefs: Anything that Barack Obama did was bad, and anything that helped foreigners was worse. He killed the program, and soon the number of Central American kids crossing over began to grow. By the spring of 2019, his administra­tion was faced with its very own crisis at the border.

His Department of Homeland Security responded with harsh measures — separating children from parents in large numbers, expelling children from Central America into Mexico and forcing asylum-seekers to remain for months in Mexico in squalid camps.

Today, we see another tide of Central Americans coming north, and Republican­s blame President Joe Biden for enticing them. They refer to it as “Biden’s border crisis,” as if it suddenly exploded on Jan. 20.

In fact, it emerged when the White House was just a gleam in Biden’s eye. The increase began last spring and built steadily over the remainder of Trump’s presidency. From May to October, the number of “southwest land border encounters” recorded by U.S. Customs and Border Patrol nearly tripled. In truth, it was dire conditions in their home countries that drove the migrants.

Republican­s claim the migrants were emboldened by Biden’s plan to stop work on Trump’s border wall — the one Mexico was supposed to pay for. That theory is implausibl­e, because Trump added only 47 miles of barriers in places that didn’t have them before.

“Only a few miles were built in South Texas, the area most prone to illegal crossings,” The New York Times recently reported. “Instead, much of the constructi­on, especially in the Trump administra­tion’s closing days, has taken place in remote parts of Arizona where crossings in recent years have been relatively uncommon.”

If Biden deserves any responsibi­lity for the recent surge, it’s not because of what he did wrong but because of what he did right. Trump’s fondness for systematic cruelty may have discourage­d some Central Americans. But the cruelty was impossible to justify even for an ostensibly good purpose.

Under Trump’s zero-tolerance policy, thousands of children were taken from their parents when the families crossed the border to exercise their right to seek political asylum. Most of the parents were sent back to their home countries. Some of the kids spent weeks sleeping on the floor in chain-link cages. Last fall, we learned the horrifying truth that the Trump administra­tion had lost track of the parents of 545 children, making it impossible to reunite the families.

The brutality was a design feature. Trump’s White House chief of staff John Kelly boasted that “a big name of the game is deterrence.” But sometimes deterrence asks too much.

There are alternativ­e remedies, such as letting more foreigners in through authorized channels. But Trump was against immigratio­n of any sort. His administra­tion virtually eliminated admissions for refugees, and last year it slashed the number of green cards for legal permanent residents.

Today, the worldwide backlog of applicatio­ns for green cards is at 5 million. Many recipients have to wait 10 years or more to be admitted. Cato Institute analysts David Bier and Alex Nowrasteh reach this startling conclusion: “At no time in American history has immigratio­n been as legally restricted as it is currently.”

For the moment, the Biden administra­tion has the task of coping with the border crisis while dismantlin­g the inhumane practices of its predecesso­r. In the longer term, it could relieve pressure on the border by increasing refugee admissions and allotting more slots to the Central American countries that have produced so many migrants.

It could create a program for guest workers from Mexico and Central America, as proposed by Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador. Biden has already moved to restore the Central American Minors Program to provide “a safe, legal, and orderly alternativ­e to the risks incurred in the attempt to migrate to the United States irregularl­y.”

Giving people an avenue to come here legally in order to keep them from coming illegally? A crazy idea, but it just might work.

 ?? GUILLERMO ARIAS/AFP ?? An aerial view Wednesday of a migrant camp where asylum seekers wait for U.S. authoritie­s to allow them to start their migration process outside El Chaparral crossing port in Tijuana, Baja California state, Mexico.
GUILLERMO ARIAS/AFP An aerial view Wednesday of a migrant camp where asylum seekers wait for U.S. authoritie­s to allow them to start their migration process outside El Chaparral crossing port in Tijuana, Baja California state, Mexico.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States