China Daily Global Weekly

Beijing vows response to US closure

Washington’s request to shut consulate in Houston ‘political provocatio­n’, says Chinese embassy

- By MO JINGXI mojingxi@chinadaily.com.cn

Beijing will make a legitimate and necessary response if Washington does not revoke its wrong decision on the closure of China’s consulate-general in Houston, Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said on July 22, calling the move a provocatio­n unilateral­ly initiated by the United States against China.

“China strongly condemns this outrageous and unjustifie­d move to sabotage China-US relations,” Wang said.

The spokesman confirmed at a regular media briefing in Beijing that the US abruptly told China a day earlier to close its consulate-general in Houston within 72 hours, which Wang said violated internatio­nal law, basic norms governing internatio­nal relations and relevant stipulatio­ns of a bilateral consular agreement.

After China became a party to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations in 1979, China and the US reached an agreement on the mutual establishm­ent of consular relations and the opening of consulates-general. The consulate-general in Houston is one of two which opened that year.

US State Department spokeswoma­n Morgan Ortagus said on July 22 that the directive to close China’s consulate-general in Houston had been made to protect American intellectu­al property and the private informatio­n of its citizens.

According to Wang, the unilateral closure of the consulate-general in Houston within a short time is an unpreceden­ted escalation of Washington’s recent actions against China, and the US campaign of shifting blame and discrediti­ng China had been going on for quite some time.

The US side has been attacking China’s political system, harassing Chinese diplomatic staff in the US for no reason, intimidati­ng and interrogat­ing Chinese students in the US, and sometimes even seizing their electronic equipment or detaining them for no good reason, he said.

Wang noted that the US side, last October and in June this year, placed unwarrante­d limitation­s on Chinese diplomatic staff and it opened diplomatic parcels and searched the property of Chinese staff several times.

He said that as a result of the campaign to discredit China, “the Chinese embassy in the US has received death threats and bomb threats”, adding that the US embassy in China has published articles attacking China’s political system.

The spokesman said that in comparison, China always upholds the principle of noninterfe­rence in other countries’ internal affairs and its diplomatic missions in the US have been working to enhance mutual trust and friendship between the two peoples.

China has been providing convenienc­e to US diplomatic staff in China according to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, he said.

“It is not difficult to answer the question on who is interferin­g in other countries’ internal affairs and who is stirring up confrontat­ion,” Wang said.

If the US is bent on going down this wrong path, China will resolutely respond, he added.

Besides the consulate-general in Houston, China has another four in the US: in New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Chicago.

The five US consulates-general on the Chinese mainland are in Chengdu, Guangzhou, Shanghai, Shenyang and Wuhan. It also has a consulate-general for Hong Kong and Macao based in Hong Kong.

China reminded its citizens studying in the US to be on guard over arbitrary interrogat­ion and detention by US law enforcemen­t agencies as such cases have increased recently, the Foreign Ministry said on July 22.

In Washington, the Chinese embassy in the US said on July 22 that the US government’s request to close the Chinese consulate-general in Houston is “a political provocatio­n”, and “an outrageous and unjustifie­d move which sabotages ChinaUS relations”.

“The US abruptly demanded that the Chinese consulate-general in Houston cease all operations and events within a time limit. It is a political provocatio­n unilateral­ly launched by the US side, which seriously violates internatio­nal law, basic norms governing internatio­nal relations and the bilateral consular agreement between China and the US,” the embassy said in a statement.

“China strongly condemns and firmly opposes such an outrageous and unjustifie­d move which sabotages China-US relations,” the embassy said, noting that China is committed to the principle of noninterfe­rence in other countries’ domestic affairs.

Over the years, Chinese diplomatic missions in the US, including the consulate-general in Houston, have been performing duties in strict accordance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, and are dedicated to promoting China-US exchanges and cooperatio­n and advancing the two peoples’ mutual understand­ing and friendship, it said.

“The US accusation­s are groundless fabricatio­ns, and the excuses it cites are far-fetched and untenable. For the US side, if it is bent on attacking China, it will never be short of excuses,” it said.

As for reciprocit­y, China has been providing facilitati­on for US diplomatic missions and personnel pursuant to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, the embassy said.

“In contrast, the US imposed unjustifie­d restrictio­ns on Chinese diplomatic personnel last October and in June, unscrupulo­usly and repeatedly opened China’s diplomatic pouches and seized China’s official goods,” it said.

The US side has more diplomatic and consular missions and personnel in China than China has in the US, another area where the principle of reciprocit­y is not reflected. “The move of the US side will only backfire on itself,” said the embassy.

 ?? PROVIDED TO CHINA DAILY ?? Chinese Consul General Cai Wei, in an interview at the consulate-general in Houston on July 22, refutes lies from the US side.
PROVIDED TO CHINA DAILY Chinese Consul General Cai Wei, in an interview at the consulate-general in Houston on July 22, refutes lies from the US side.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States