China Daily Global Weekly

Awaiting the next chapter in thrilling China story

A race should be won by outrunning others, not by striking down the opponent

- By Seung-ho Kim

Recently, I arrived in Shanghai as the Republic of Korea’s consul general. The period for which I will be serving in this diplomatic function will overlap with the early years of the 28 years between China’s two great centennial celebratio­ns — namely establishm­ent of the Communist Party of China and the People’s Republic of China.

By coincidenc­e, I traveled every nook and cranny of this country alone as a backpacker 28 years ago. Since then, I was posted to various European countries, and it was only in December that I finally arrived in Shanghai. The 28 years of absence has brought pleasant surprises and a fairly accurate descriptio­n of how much this country has changed.

To say nothing of the jawdroppin­g high-rises, I also feel the changes within the Chinese people, which, interestin­gly, they do not notice. They have become way more confident than the people I met as a traveler 28 years ago. It seems to me they have strong confidence of their past achievemen­ts, current path and the future success they are certain of.

This confidence makes them smile, be patient and kind, and show good manners. Both the unpolished kindness and unbridled curiosity that once surprised a young diplomat turned into the usual manners that I have become accustomed to during my diplomatic life. The timid and concerned eyes of youngsters that I met in the long train carriages with hard seats are replaced with the dazzling pride and bottomless cheers of the so-called linglingho­u, or the postmillen­nial generation.

I admire the remarkable changes that the Chinese people have attained and I pay great respect to their efforts and hard work for this success.

However, when we drink, we should remember the one who dug the well. In 1921, the story began when a dozen young men gathered in Shanghai. That was how the first 28 years started with the establishm­ent of the Party. The story of life and death, success and failure, joy and despair.

The relations between China and the United States have entered a critical period, both from the perspectiv­es of the global landscape and the course of history. The developmen­t of bilateral relations, which mostly depends on choices made by the US, is of great significan­ce to the bigger picture of global peace and developmen­t.

Since the turn of this century, the power gap between China and the US has been narrowing across a large set of economic, technologi­cal and military indicators.

Since 2018 the US government has made dramatic changes to its China policy — taking China as a major strategic competitor. It has sought to undermine China’s political and financial security by launching a trade war, containing Chinese technology companies and provoking diplomatic face-offs. Bilateral relations have been dominated by competitio­n and confrontat­ion.

A world in which major powers confront with each other is inevitably going to be divided and turbulent, with the risk of conflicts or even wars, which will in turn hurt the interests of the major powers.

Therefore, as the world’s two major countries, China and the US should view and manage the bilateral relationsh­ip from the perspectiv­e of being highly responsibl­e for the whole of humanity.

Regrettabl­y, the US, a master in strategies and geopolitic­s, is short of cultural and historical awareness. US elites are good at understand­ing things on a strategic level, but lack the capability to view and understand global and historical developmen­ts from a broader perspectiv­e of the grand history of humanity, especially the evolution of civilizati­ons. US doomsayers have repeatedly predicted a so-called collapse and color revolution in China, but neither has occurred.

The US needs to have a better understand­ing of China’s rise from a historical perspectiv­e.

History tells us that a country’s behavior pattern is dependent on its strength as well as its cultural genes. The argument that a strong nation is bound to seek hegemony finds no supporting case in China’s history and goes against the will of the Chinese people. China has always upheld the principle of “seeking harmony without uniformity”.

Both historical inheritanc­e and practical interests determine that China will not challenge the existing internatio­nal order or, as some Western countries used to, seek hegemony with strength and seek profits by flexing muscles. Rather, China is taking a path of peaceful rise by showcasing inclusiven­ess with other nations and civilizati­ons, integratin­g with the existing internatio­nal order and seeking harmonious co-existence with the rest of the world.

This is supported by countless historical evidence, near or far. Over the thousands of years before it entered modern times, China was a powerful nation, but it did not use its strength to bully weaker ones through invasion, occupation or colonizati­on. Therefore, there was rarely war among East Asian nations as China maintained long-lasting peaceful and stable relations with its neighbors, in sharp contrast with frequent wars on the European continent.

An increasing­ly stronger China means more major-country responsibi­lities. “If poor, they attended to their own virtue in solitude; if advanced to dignity, they made the whole kingdom virtuous as well,” said Meng Zi, a Confucian master, who lived more than 2,000 years ago. This ancient Chinese maxim describes the lofty aspiration­s and vision cherished by the Chinese people. China is pursuing the establishm­ent of a harmonious world and pushing forward the building of a community with a shared future for mankind.

Along with its peaceful rise, China is fulfilling its responsibi­lities to its people and also contributi­ng to the common good of the world, providing more global public goods — such as the Asian Infrastruc­ture Investment Bank, the Silk Road Fund and the Belt and Road Initiative — and shoulderin­g more global responsibi­lities in such areas as peacekeepi­ng, disaster relief, combating the pandemic and debt relief. As it pursues its peaceful rise and the great rejuvenati­on of the Chinese nation, China is bound to make greater contributi­ons to the cause of human progress.

In the face of the rise of China, the US has two options — containmen­t and suppressio­n or pursuing mutually beneficial cooperatio­n. Should the US be determined to contain the rise of China, it will have to decouple itself from China and confront it, which is bound to hurt the developmen­t of the US and accelerate its decline. Take the economic arena as an example, the increase of a country’s economic strength is determined by the division of labor and market forces. Division of labor results in the exchange of goods or services.

If the US withdraws from the enormous Chinese market, it will soon be replaced by other countries or by China itself. The restrictio­ns imposed by the US on exports to China’s chip makers belong to such category. The US has lifted a rock only to drop it on its own feet.

The US position and interests in the new global landscape could be safeguarde­d to the greatest extent if the US adopts a simple shift in thinking to incorporat­e China into the existing internatio­nal and regional order, which was built and is dominated by the US, and builds a fairer and more reasonable internatio­nal and regional order acceptable to more countries through working with China to make improvemen­ts and adjustment­s.

The world’s two major powers will inevitably compete with each other, but such competitio­n should be like a foot race in which the victory is earned by outrunning others, instead of a boxing match in which the winner knocks down the opponent. Winning the competitio­n should be based on one’s own efforts instead of striking down your opponent. Therefore, China and the US should have goodwill competitio­n and pursue mutually beneficial cooperatio­n.

The author is deputy director of the Institute of World Economics and Politics at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. The author contribute­d this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily. The views do not necessaril­y reflect those of China Daily.

 ?? JIN YU / FOR CHINA DAILY ??
JIN YU / FOR CHINA DAILY

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States