Bush Foundation stresses dialogue
Online event underscores importance of US-China bilateral ties, cooperation
After he retired from national political life, former United States president George H.W. Bush worked to advance the dialogue between China and the United States by hosting conferences to promote what he called the “most consequential bilateral relationship” in the world.
As he progressed in age, Bush, a Republican, asked one of his sons, Neil Bush, to chair the meetings on his behalf, an arrangement that ultimately ushered in the founding of the George H.W. Bush Foundation for US-China Relations in May 2017, about a year and a half before the 41st US president died.
“My dad believed that countries and families and friends need to stay in touch with one another, in order to better understand one another, in order to put yourself in the other guy’s shoes” so as to address conflicts “in a mature way” when they arise, said Bush, the founder and chairman of the foundation.
“We got away from that for five years or so,” Bush said on Aug 30 at a webinar in which he recalled the start of the organization and reflected on the 50 years of US-China relations and his father’s legacy.
That is why the Bush China organization and many “moderates” are committed to getting the relations back on course, and in that course, dialogue and communication are crucial, Bush and the foundation’s president and CEO David Firestein said at the discussion, hosted by the Center for China and Globalization in Beijing.
“We’ve come into this kind of crazy time where China’s rise is all of a sudden being recognized by politicians as a threat to the United States,” and China has become an easy target, Bush said.
Once the US can get over the hurdle that China does not represent a threat to its national security, economy or way of life, then “through dialogue, we’ll establish better understanding and more cooperation”, he said.
The US has values to stand on, he said, but they should be expressed in a way that is “respectful and not fingerpointing, or in a derogatory way”.
“The ultimate goal should be to come together as often as possible in as many different ways as possible, and to resolve challenges, you know, respectfully and maturely,” Bush said.
Firestein said that for most of the past half-century, there had been a bipartisan consensus that it was good for the US to engage China. That largely held until the administration of Donald Trump. Unfortunately, he said, there is a new consensus in Washington that pictures China as the US’ enemy.
“The Bush China foundation rejects that,” Firestein said.
The former career US diplomat and author of many books on China said the belief that drove the consensus is rooted in two erroneous assessments of China’s intentions.
The first of these assessments holds that China is seeking to displace the US and supplant it as the world’s only superpower.
“I think that is an absolutely fundamental misreading of what China actually wants to do,” Firestein said.
Second, those people believe that China is seeking to replicate its system all across the world.
“I think those are incorrect understandings of what China actually seeks to do,” Firestein said.
“When the fundamental premises of US policy toward China are wrong, the resulting policies that purport to address those concerns are going to veer off course, and I think that’s what we’ve seen over the last several years.”
Chinese Ambassador to the US Qin Gang also noted that some people in the US believe that China is betting against the US, and that China’s goal is to challenge and displace the US.
“This is a serious misjudgment of China’s strategic intention,” Qin said in an online reception by the National Committee on US-China Relations board of directors on Aug 31.
China’s plans and policies are tailored for the purpose of meeting the people’s aspirations for a better life. It has never considered surpassing the US as its goal, or having the ambition to challenge and displace the US, or to seek global hegemony, Qin said.
Firestein said a number of differences between the two largest economies are “simply irreconcilable”, but they can still have a businesslike, results-oriented, mutually beneficial and politically sustainable relationship.
“We all aspire to do that, and rather than say, look, because we disagree on all these different profound issues, let’s take our ball and go home, we advocate the opposite. We advocate for the idea that this is all the more reason that we need to come together with a problem-solving mindset,” Firestein said.
Bush and Firestein propose that the US and China should cooperate on climate change, pandemic prevention, the Afghanistan situation and in the energy sector.