China Daily Global Weekly

Anti-China stance harmful to US interests

Beijing bashing now common in Washington policy and rhetoric but comes at a cost, experts warn

- By LIA ZHU in San Francisco and ZHAO RUINAN in Beijing Contact the writers at liazhu@chinadaily­usa.com

US government policies aimed at countering China’s growth and advancemen­t face challenges, and the current negative rhetoric toward China will only harm the United States’ own interests, experts say.

“China is not a monolith … There’s a danger in demonizing everything Chinese,” said Tami Overby, a senior adviser at the Albright Stonebridg­e Group, at a recent webinar hosted by the US-Asia Institute examining the impact of US policies on China.

The US government is leveraging industrial policy and other policies, including export controls, sanctions, tariffs, inbound investment restrictio­ns and the likelihood of outbound investment and capital flow restrictio­ns to counter China’s advance.

“Let’s remember, the Chinese are buying. They’re our largest agricultur­e buyer. We export tons of farm products, and a lot of them go to China,” said Overby.

She is worried that the Republican and Democratic parties will compete with each other over who can bash China more as the US heads into the 2024 presidenti­al election cycle. “Let’s not lose our minds, and not act against our own national interests,” she warned.

Qin Gang, making his first media appearance as Chinese foreign minister, said on March 7 that the US perception of China is seriously distorted, and the US claims of competitio­n with China are meant to contain and suppress China in all respects.

He accused the US of ignoring internatio­nal rules despite its repeated talk of rules and said the so-called guardrails the Joe Biden administra­tion advocates mean China does not defend its own interests. “That is just impossible,” Qin said.

Gao Zhikai, vice-president of the Center for China and Globalizat­ion, a Beijing-based nongovernm­ental think tank, said that the US is “using competitio­n as an excuse for maximum pressure against China”, in an attempt to delay, disrupt and derail China’s peaceful developmen­t.

He pointed out that Washington is suffering from “the toxic mixing up of two self-imposed nightmares”: one is the “hysteria” about China’s economy surpassing the US and once that happens, China will push the US out of the center of the world stage and impose its values on the US.

However, Gao said the reality is that “no force in the world can stop China’s steady peaceful rise” and “either in the past, present, or in the future” China has never, and will never, impose anything on any other country.

As for the US’ so-called “Indo-Pacific” strategy, Gao said it is a propositio­n designed to disrupt and destabiliz­e the region with “a road map for conflict, confrontat­ion and rivalry which may lead to Cold War and even hot war in the world”.

Echoing Gao, Xu Liping, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences’ National Institute of Internatio­nal Strategy, said what the US government has done in countering China is a demonstrat­ion of its hegemony.

“The US has been continuous­ly countering and decoupling from China, trying to exert more pressure on the country. This encircleme­nt, in fact, is a continuati­on of the US’ hegemonic thinking, which has actually caused serious damage to the Sino-US relationsh­ip,” Xu said.

A recent move on the US’ so-called economic decoupling with China was a hearing held by the new US congressio­nal select committee on the competitio­n with China.

Anna Ashton, director of China Corporate Affairs and US-China at Eurasia Group, said what struck her most was the criticism of US governors for courting Chinese investment or helping businesses in their states to do business in China.

“Foreign direct investment tends to be a much more efficient way of creating a concentrat­ion of new jobs. The criticism of state-level developmen­t agencies for their past efforts to court investment from China among many other places was unfair,” she said.

Experts have long called for peaceful and constructi­ve relations between the two biggest economies as the world is faced with more challenges in the post-COVID era.

“China’s economic transforma­tion since 1978 has created abundant opportunit­ies for American businesses of all kinds and generated huge benefits for consumers throughout the US for four decades. Rather than poisoning the Sino-US ties, the US decision-makers (should) better serve the fundamenta­l interests of the American people with realism and pragmatism,” said Gao from the Beijing think tank.

“The Chinese people and the American people can live in peace and friendship and have constructi­ve and mutual beneficial relations with each other.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States