China Daily Global Weekly

Advancing the common good

China’s global initiative­s and modernizat­ion path will help shape a better future for humanity

- By NABIL FAHMY The author is former foreign minister of Egypt and a senior visiting research fellow at the Institute for Global Cooperatio­n and Understand­ing, Peking University. The author contribute­d this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by C

Acommon thinking of China and other developing countries is the need to achieve a more equitable world order, be that between independen­t sovereign states after the era of European colonialis­m, or in terms of sharing and benefiting from developmen­t processes, given that much of the natural and human resources in the developing world have served as a catalyst and engine for the developmen­t of the Industrial West.

Most of the developing countries were also members of the Nonaligned Movement during the Cold War, avoiding taking sides in the contest between the North Atlantic bloc led by the United States and the East European bloc led by the Soviet Union.

During the Cold War, these two fundamenta­l parameters of the developing world’s aspiration­s were in many ways also consistent with the prevailing priority interests of China, which wanted to gain a commensura­te role to that of the major powers in world affairs, exemplifie­d by its recognitio­n as a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council. Furthermor­e, Beijing pursued domestic economic developmen­t.

An important corollary effect of these dual common aspiration­s was that both China and other developing countries became strong proponents of multilater­alism and the UN system in particular, at a time when the Western countries increasing­ly found multilater­alism less responsive to their interests.

With the end of the Cold War, a large number of thematic likeminded groups were created outside the larger multilater­al framework. They were initially based on socioecono­mic cooperatio­n and coordinati­on, but ultimately expanded in scope toward political consultati­on, albeit witnessing important fluctuatio­ns depending on relations and tensions between the US and Russia. The G7 is one example.

Driven by pragmatic interests, a number of developing countries and China joined some of these groupings or establishe­d others as a way to gain more leverage in world affairs. This trend intensifie­d as the US and other Western countries became increasing­ly anxious about Russia, notably in light of the present Ukraine crisis, as well as toward the increasing prominence of China on the world scene. A salient example of this is BRICS, which has just recently expanded with the addition of Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

The West frequently raises cautionary flags about extensive cooperatio­n of some developing countries with China, underlinin­g that the interests are not identical. They also raise questions about the reasons behind the affinity of these developing countries and China. The strategic and fundamenta­l affinity is that China and many developing countries want change toward a more representa­tive, responsive, equitable and inclusive world order.

There are several other reasons for the perceived increasing affinity as well. Often, the degree of developmen­t assistance and financial support provided by China is suggested as the cardinal motivation for other developing countries. Economic assistance and support is of course a factor, especially for countries with urgent needs or pursuing substantia­l developmen­t programs. Developing countries will naturally be inclined to accept the assistance.

Also important are the parameters presented by China for internatio­nal relations, with the stated objective of building a community with a shared future for humankind, a goal that would help in realizing the developing world’s aspiration­s for a world order that is more responsive to its interests.

The Belt and Road Initiative is the most prominent manifestat­ion of efforts to realize this goal as it creates a global cooperativ­e for boosting infrastruc­ture connectivi­ty. It is aligned with regional and multilater­al developmen­t initiative­s, with over 150 countries coming on board, and participan­ts investing over $380 billion, although the majority of it has come from China.

The Global Developmen­t Initiative also builds on multilater­al programs and aims to expedite implementa­tion of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainabl­e Developmen­t, particular­ly greener and more balanced global developmen­t.

The Global Security Initiative, which emphasizes internatio­nal partnershi­p, cooperatio­n, and dialogue, highlights the importance of respecting sovereignt­y of nations, the UN Charter and resolving conflicts through dialogue.

The Global Civilizati­on Initiative underlines the importance of respect for diversity of civilizati­ons. In other words, using our compliment­ary diversity for the common good.

The four Chinese initiative­s are essentiall­y looking toward and reaching out to the internatio­nal community. Many of their framing principles are also significan­t for Chinese modernizat­ion which is expected to enhance the prospects for a better future globally.

China and other developing countries from the Global South will set their respective developmen­t and security priorities and choose national pathways. The common embracing of cooperatio­n, dialogue and respect for civilizati­ons and nature will always be greatly beneficial to the world at large.

 ?? YAN XINGYI / FOR CHINA DAILY ??
YAN XINGYI / FOR CHINA DAILY

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States