China Daily Global Edition (USA)

Trade ties are called unshakable China, US can solve any disputes by talking, Commerce Ministry says

- By By ZHONG ZHONGNAN NAN and JING and JING SHUIYU SHUIYU in Beijing Contact the writers at zhongnan@chinadaily.com.cn

ChinaChina and and the the United United States Statescan resolvecan resolveany trade any disputestr­ade disputesth­rough throughtal­ks, since talks, bilaterals­ince bilateralt­rade and trade economican­d economic cooperatio­n cooperatio­nhave made have the madetwo countriest­he two countries inseparabl­e, inseparabl­e,the Ministryth­e Ministryof Commerceof Commercesa­id ahead of said US ahead president-electof US president-elect Donald Donald Trump’s Trump’staking office taking on Friday.office on Even Friday. though there are voices Evenin the Unitedthou­gh there States are callingvoi­ces for in protection­istthe United States trade calling measures for protection­istor having a trade trade measures war with China,or havingthe twoa trade sides war can with work China,out new the solutions,two sides can and work bilateral out ties new won’t solutions,be shakenand bilateralb­y such opinions,ties won’t saidbe shaken Ministry by suchof Commerceop­inions, said spokesmanM­inistry of Sun CommerceJi­wen. spokesman Sun Jiwen.

Bilateral trade volume amounted to $519.6 billion in 2016 — 211 times higher than in 1979. Two-way investment also notably surged, exceeding $170 billion by the end of last year, data from the ministry shows.

“The Chinese government is willing to work with the new US administra­tion to generate more Bilateral benefits tradefor businesses­volume amountedan­d consumerst­o $519.6on both billion sides,”in 2016said Sun.— 211 times higher than in 1979. Bilateral Two-way trade investment­and investment­also notably created surged, 2.6 exceeding million $170 jobs billionin the by US the and end of contribute­dlast year, data $216 from billion the to ministryth­e US shows. economy “Thein 2015 Chinese alone, government according is to willing a report to releasedwo­rk with earlierthe new this US month administra­tionby the US-Chinato generate Business more Council. benefits for businesses and The consumers Chinese on middleboth sides,” class saidwill continueSu­n. to grow over the next Bilateral decade trade and and will investment likely exceed createdthe entire2.6 millionUS population­jobs in the by US 2026, and the contribute­dreport said. $216 Goods billion and to servicethe US exportseco­nomy from in 2015the alone,US to accordingC­hina areto a expectedre­port releasedto reach earlier$369 billionthi­s monthby 2026 by and the US-China$520 billion Business by 2050, Council.it added.

The Jack ChineseMa, executive middle class chairman will continueof Alibabato grow Group over Holding,the next decadesaid at and the will likely World exceed Economic the entire Forum US in population Davos, Switzerlan­d,by 2026, thatthe reporta trade said. war Goods between and the service world’s exports two from biggest the US economiest­o China are would expectedbe a disasterto reach $369for the billion globalby 2026 economyand $520and billionhe wouldby 2050,do it anythingad­ded.

Jack Ma, executive chairman of Alibaba Group Holding, said at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerlan­d, that a trade war between the world’s two within biggesthis power economiest­o prevent would it. be Maa disastersa­id he wouldfor the even global sacrifice economy his and companyhe wouldif thatdo anythingwo­uld prevent within suchhis powera conflict.to preventRen Hongbin,it. chairman of ChinaMa said Nationalhe would even Machinerys­acrifice Industryhi­s companyCor­p, knownif that wouldas Sinomach, prevent such said a conflict. companies on both Ren sides Hongbin, believe chairmanth­ere are of still China opportunit­ies. National Machinery “SinomachIn­dustry Corp,has set known goals as to Sinomach,deepen ties said with companiesG­eneral Electricon both sideson a believe wind-powerthere are projectsti­ll opportunit­ies.in Africa after they put a pilot project “Sinomachin­to operationh­as set goalsin Kenyato deepenin 2016,”ties with said GeneralRen. Electric Zhaoon a Ping, wind-power director projectof the in department­Africa after of they internatio­nalput a pilot projecttra­de into research operationa­t thein Kenya China in Council201­6,” saidfor Ren.the Promotion of Internatio­nalZhao Ping, director Trade, of said:the department“Rising frictionso­f internatio­nalare normal. ... tradeBut this research doesn’tat the mean China that Councilthe­re will for be the an Promotioni­ntensive tradeof Internatio­nalwar, as their Trade, economicsa­id: “Rising and trade frictions relationsa­re normal.have become... But this more doesn’t interdepen­dent.”mean that there will Whenbe an asked intensivet­o sum trade up war, relations as their with economicth­e US underand trade President relations Barack have become Obama, more who interdepen­dent.”leaves office on Friday, Foreign MinistryWh­en asked spokeswoma­nto sum Huaup relations Chunying with said the on US Thursdayun­der Presidentt­hat “importantB­arack Obama, progress” who has leavesbeen office made on on Friday, bilateral Foreign ties Ministryan­d the two spokeswoma­ncountries shouldHua Chunyingmo­ve forwardsai­d on as Thursday partners that rather “importantt­han competitor­s. progress” has been made on bilateral ties and the Contacttwo countriest­he writers shouldat zhongnan@chinadaily.com.cn move forward as partners rather than competitor­s.

Some hawkish members of the Donald Trump team have repeatedly adopted war-like rhetoric about the incoming administra­tion’s trade relations with China and other developing countries. They seem to want to send the message that other countries need the United States more than the other way round. But like many presumptuo­us war mongers in the past, they may not see the whole picture or understand history. The trade war warriors’ first miscalcula­tion is not recognizin­g that the world is now vastly different from the 1980s, when Ronald Reagan, their role model, was US president.

Since then, according to the World Bank, the global total of merchandis­e exports has climbed more than eight times to almost $16.5 trillion in 2015.

Of this amount, the United States accounts for a little more than 9 percent. So its ability to mobilize enough war efforts against the largest exporter, which accounts for 13.8 percent, cannot but be limited.

Second, according to the World Trade Organizati­on, although China is dependent on the US for 18 percent of its total exports, larger than the US is on China (7.7 percent), China’s global reach is more extensive.

Third, as a result of its economic transition that has been underway over the past fewyears, China is increasing­ly less dependent on the making of small daily commoditie­s. It has grown to be a versatile manufactur­er and, empowered by up to 7 million college graduates every year, is now producing some of the best machinery in the world.

More recently, China has also grown into a worldwide investor, and most importantl­y in large infrastruc­ture projects and technologi­es.

Last but not the least, the new administra­tion has promised that the US economy will create 25 million more jobs. Can Trump’s trade war lieutenant­s say what these new workers will produce and, more pertinentl­y, to whom these products will be sold?

If the US is going to produce more, it will have to sell more, and it will have to sell more to the rest of the world. And one of the world’s largest, and most rapidly growing group, of consumers will be in developing countries such as China.

So trying to shut out China is unwise, because it is equivalent to shutting out some of the best opportunit­ies that free trade can generate for an economy. All the trade war threat to China is just the bluffing of a paper tiger.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States