China Daily Global Edition (USA)
A TALE OF BETRAYAL
A new book by FrancesWood and Christopher Arnander shows how China played a vital role in the Allies’ victory inWorldWar I. But instead of honor and appreciation, its efforts were disparaged, discounted and disregarded. reports.
One hundred years ago, Europe was convulsed. Its young men were fighting war on an industrial scale. The carnage was meantto result in thewartoendall wars. It led in actual fact toVersailles, the peace to end all peace, the great betrayal made up of lesser betrayals.
Betrayed Ally (China in the Great War) by Frances Wood and Christopher Arnander, superbly written and informative, shows howChina playedacritical, though unheralded, role in securing victory for the Allies. But instead of gratitude and appreciation, its efforts werescorned, deridedandignored.
The peace conference of 1918-19 mayhavehadhighideals but itwas undermined by subterfuge, intrigue and that word again, betrayal.
TheChinese delegates refused to sign the Versailles treaty and with good reason.
The treaty gave Japan a foothold in China that would lead to outright invasion.
This book provides an invaluable insight. Both authors are well equipped to chisel out this rich seam of history.
Wood is a Sinologist who has writtenmorethan 12 booksonChinese themes. She was born in London in 1948. After art school in Liverpool, she studied Chinese at Newnham College, Cambridge and the universities of Peking and London, where she got a doctorate in philosophy in Chinese. In 1977, she joined the British Library and became curator of the Chinese collections.
Arnander was educated at Harrow School and Oriel College, Oxford, where he studied classics. He taught classics at a school in Scarborough and theUniversity of Minnesota. From 1957, he pursued a banking career in the City of London, KuwaitandSaudi Arabia. His Pavilions in the Air is an illustrated collection of Chinese and English proverbs, coauthored withWood.
Chinawasonthe cusp of change and this was accelerated by Versailles.
When news arrived that Japan’s imperial wishes had prevailed over China, riots led by students broke out outside the Gate of Heavenly Peace in Beijing.
One of the first battles was fought on Chinese soil, after a violation of sovereignty.
Japan, who threw in its lot with the Allies early on, landed its soldiers nearQingdao, aGermanconcession, on Sept 18, 1914.
The Japanese were outside the area designated as the concession and, like the Germans in Belgium, violated China’s neutrality by marching an army across neutral territory.
Great Britain was not jingoistic aboutthecampaign, to saytheleast.
General Barnardiston’s small body of men was officially sent in order to “show cooperation” and Barnardiston was informed that he was to take orders from the Japanese, a fact kept conveniently quiet in London.
The joint Anglo-Japanese force tookQingdao onNov 7, 1914.
At face value theVersailles peace conference should have made an inspirational example of China’s situation, with pockets of foreign occupation dotted down its coast.
The betrayal concerns China’s dashed hopes.
Point 5 of US President WoodrowWilson’s 14Points as principles forpeacecalled for settling colonial claims such that … the interests of the populations concerned must have equal weight with the equitable claims of the government whose title is to be determined.
This was interpreted, rightly by China, as covering their claim to Qingdao and even the other treaty ports. So, theChinese delegation to Versailles claimed that secret agreements and arrangements wereaninsult toWilson’s 14Points.
But Wilson was deeply compromised.
To make his League of Nations work, he needed Japan. This was the fatal design flaw.
The irony of course was that it was the US senate, in November 1919, that voted against joining the league.
China joined the Allies the same year as theUnited States butChina stands accused, in some quarters, of opportunism — a harsh judgment, not as frequently passed on theUS.
Almost 140,000 Chinese served in France, as laborers, doing essential maintenance work on roads, trenches, railways and tanks and making up for the drastic manpower shortage by working in French factories and fields.
They were mostly from the north, as it was presumed, by the Allies, that they would be better able to deal with the cold.
The Chinese offered to dispatch 340,000mentoFranceandRussia, along with 100,000 rifles. Their work rate was renowned. Trenches were dug faster than British troops and they carried the heaviest objects with the greatest of ease, earning the praise of Lloyd George, the wartime UK prime minister, in 1916.
The Chinese Labour Corps was pivotal to the Allied effort. Whether filling in for French industrial jobs, helping to dig trenches and dugouts, often within range of enemy artillery, and crucially, in manning the workshops of the Tank Corps, the CLC became an indispensable part of the war effort and an essential prerequisite of tank deployment in 1918.
At least 5,000 — perhaps as many as 10,000 — lost their lives, some at sea. Others served in Russia, and were caught up in theRussian Revolution. Their fate is mostly unknown.