China Daily Global Edition (USA)
Top four ways to shrink your carbon footprint are often overlooked
MIAMI — Researchers in Sweden have identified the top four things people can do to reduce their carbon footprint, but warned on July 11 these steps are rarely promoted in the public sphere.
The report in the journal Environmental Research Letters described a “missed opportunity” to let people know the most effective steps they can take to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, a primary driver of global warming.
“We found there are four actions that could result in substantial decreases in an individual’s carbon footprint — eating a plant-based diet, avoiding air travel, living carfree, and having smaller families,” says lead author Seth Wynes of Lund University in Sweden.
“For example, living carfree saves about 2.4 tons of CO2 equivalent per year, while eating a plant-based diet saves 0.8 tons of CO2 equivalent a year.”
Avoiding airplane travel saves about 1.6 tons of CO2 equivalent per trip.
By far the biggest action — having one fewer child — saves an average of 58.6 tons of CO2-equivalent emission reductions per year, the report says.
“A US family who chooses to have one fewer child would provide the same level of emissions reductions as 684 teenagers who choose to adopt comprehensive for the rest of lives,” it says.
These four steps were identified from an analysis of 39 peer-reviewed papers, carbon calculators, and government reports that calculate how individual lifestyle choices may reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
When researchers looked to see which anti-carbon actions were promoted in Canadian textbooks and government communications in the United States, Australia, Europe and Canada, they found a general recycling their focus on “incremental changes with much smaller potential to reduce emissions”.
For instance, commonly promoted government strategies included changing light bulbs and comprehensive recycling.
Researchers said these steps are respectively eight and four times less effective than a plant-based diet.
None of the Canadian textbooks mentioned limiting family size as a way of reducing one’s carbon footprint.
Streamlining the message from schools and from governments could make major steps toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions, researchers say.
“There are so many factors that affect the climate impact of personal choices, but bringing all these studies side by side gives us confidence we’ve identified actions that make a big difference,” says Wynes.
“Those of us who want to step forward on climate need to know how our actions can have the greatest possible impact.”