China Daily Global Edition (USA)

Plan to produce a manufactur­ing powerhouse

-

One of the reasons the launch of Apple’s iPhone 8 in China reportedly drew a muted reaction is Chinese consumers can now get much of what Apple offers in domestical­ly developed smartphone­s, such as those manufactur­ed by Xiaomi and Huawei.

And smartphone­s are only one of the technologi­cal breakthrou­ghs China has made in recent years. China now leads the world in high-speed railways, mobile payments and e-commerce.

One of the pillars of this innovation-driven growth is the Made in China 2025 strategy introduced by the government in 2015, which aims to boost manufactur­ing innovation and transform China into a leading manufactur­ing powerhouse. China has long realized that the world factory model for its economy, based on low-end, lowwage, low added-value production, is no longer sustainabl­e. And it has been feeling the pressure of competitio­n both from traditiona­l manufactur­ing leaders such as Germany and the United States, which are vigorously pursuing a manufactur­ing renaissanc­e following the global financial crisis, and from emerging economies such as India and Brazil, which now have lower labor costs.

In the emerging fourth industrial revolution, China has to focus on innovation and move up the industrial value chain. This is where the Made in China 2025 strategy comes in. Over the past two years, the plan has been implemente­d smoothly, yet it has also drawn criticism from some Western countries, who claim that it is an industrial policy based on unfair government support for Chinese companies and forced technology transfers from Western companies in exchange for access to the Chinese market.

Growing anxiety about losing their market share and technologi­cal lead to China is understand­able, but misplaced. The strategy explicitly embraces the “market-based” principle and sees the government’s role as “creating a stable policy environmen­t for enterprise­s”. China is further streamlini­ng government administra­tion by releasing its seventh revision of the Foreign Investment Catalogue, which has introduced a nationwide Negative List and scrapped up to 30 special administra­tive measures restrictin­g foreign investment.

And as repeatedly pointed out by Premier Li Keqiang, all businesses registered in China, be they domestic or foreign, are considered Chinese businesses and thus entitled to enjoy the policy incentives offered by the strategy. Furthermor­e, there are no mandatory technology transfer requiremen­ts for foreign companies operating in China, and the government has been working hard to protect the intellectu­al property rights of innovators both domestic and foreign.

Opening-up is another key element of the Made in China 2025 plan, the phrase appears 16 times in the policy document. As Premier Li Keqiang noted at the meeting of the New Champions 2017, the plan does not shut the door on imports of foreign equipment; instead, the plan emphasizes cooperatio­n for win-win results.

However, even as the opportunit­ies for cooperatio­n with Chinese companies have multiplied, the preferenti­al treatment foreign-invested ventures used to enjoy in the early stages of China’s opening-up and WTO accession have petered out, and Chinese companies have proven to be formidable in catching up with the latest technologi­cal and industrial trends, which has placed them more or less at the same starting point vis-à-vis their Western counterpar­ts in the fourth industrial revolution.

The test, therefore, lies in whether countries can turn competitio­n into win-win cooperatio­n, or succumb to darker instincts of protection­ism. Greater competitio­n is to be welcomed as it lowers costs and fastens innovation. Misguided attempts to hold back the tide will would only end up hurting the opportunit­ies for common developmen­t and undermine free and fair trade.

Thus China welcomes global cooperatio­n under its Made in China 2025 plan, as it will boost innovation­driven growth. This in turn will benefit more people not just in China but also the world. The author is a Beijingbas­ed researcher on internatio­nal studies.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States