China Daily Global Edition (USA)

EU data policy reflects its cyber-strategy

-

The European Union’s “strictest-ever” General Data Protection Regulation came into effect on May 25. While the GDPR is aimed at protecting people’s private informatio­n, it has also sparked a debate on whether it will curb the progress of informatio­n technology enterprise­s in the EU. Two experts share their views on the issue with China Daily’s Zhang Zhouxiang. Excerpts follow:

Lu Chuanying, an associate researcher at Shanghai Institutes for Internatio­nal Studies

The GDPR has strict, detailed rules for the collection, storage, usage, transfer, as well as disposal of personal data, and covers the entire business process of both online and brick-and-mortar enterprise­s. It is thus fair to say the GDPR reflects the strategic purpose of the EU in cyberspace.

For long, the EU has relied on the United States for cybersecur­ity and the developmen­t of its digital economy. But now that the EU has set standards for cyberspace activities, its say in cyberspace-related affairs on the global stage could increase. More important, the EU’s specific standards could even influence global cyberspace.

However, in the long run, the GDPR may not be riskfree.

First, it will increase the cost of collecting and using data for enterprise­s. And while giant IT enterprise­s may be able to shift the cost to their customers, many small and medium-sized enterprise­s (SMEs) could be forced to wind up. In particular, startup enterprise­s will suffer. Besides, the fact that the EU has only a few IT enterprise­s with global influence could leave it at a disadvanta­ge in global competitio­n.

Second, digital economy relies heavily on the collection of big data from users for analysis. And the EU’s strict regulation will, to a large extent, block this path and could change the business mode of the digital economy as a whole.

And third, the EU evaluates other economies and regions using its own standards and has now set very complicate­d legal procedures for those that fail to meet them. In response, some countries and regions could take countermea­sures by limiting their data transfer to the EU and thus isolate the bloc. The worst victims in such a case would be ordinary netizens.

Since there is no absolute privacy in cyberspace, authoritie­s should use a balanced regulatory policy so as not to hurt their own economies. Only time will tell whether the GDPR is a balanced or extreme policy.

Most of the media reports say the GDPR clearly defines the duties of companies that collect and store data, but few have noticed that it also grants individual­s new rights, such as access to their data, the “right to be forgotten” (replacing a more limited right of erasure), and the right to refuse any automatic decision-making. By strengthen­ing these rights, the EU aims to better protect human rights.

The EU hopes to minimize the possible negative effects on IT enterprise­s operating in Europe. A major obstacle between IT giants and SMEs is that the former often have big data storage which helps them to analyze and make correct decisions, while the data pools of the latter are too small to help. Certain clauses of the GDPR are aimed at facilitati­ng data flow between them and thus remove this obstacle.

But it remains a challenge for the EU to strike the right balance between protection

Liu Quan, a senior researcher in cybersecur­ity at the China Center for Informatio­n Industry Developmen­t affiliated to the Ministry of Industry and Informatio­n Technology

of personal data and free flow of data. Thanks to growing internet awareness across the world, an increasing number of people today consider the protection of personal data very important. For example, according to an Accenture survey conducted sometimes earlier, about 63 percent of the respondent­s in Britain were unwilling to accept open banking services, and their prime worry was leak of personal data.

Hopefully, the EU will address this problem by implementi­ng and improving the GDPR. After all, digital prosperity should be combined with better protection of citizens’ rights.

 ?? SHI YU / CHINA DAILY ??
SHI YU / CHINA DAILY
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States