China Daily Global Edition (USA)

Timely crackdown on cheats helps guarantee fairness

-

SINCE LAST MONTH, the public security authoritie­s in the Inner Mongolia autonomous region and Liaoning, Shandong, Hubei, Guangdong and Sichuan provinces have been cracking down on the producing and selling of high-tech wireless equipment tailor-made for cheating in exams. Beijing Youth Daily comments:

The action of the public security department­s, which comes before the national college entrance exam, or gaokao, that began on Thursday, has eradicated 12 gangs engaged in the business, and more than 100,000 sets of such equipment were seized.

Statistics shows about 9.75 million people will sit the exam this year, the highest number of examinees in eight years. And some of the targeted provincial­level regions have the highest number of gaokao takers, which makes their exams more competitiv­e.

The Amendment to the Criminal Law introduced three years ago stipulates that those caught cheating in the national college entrance exam face up to seven years in prison. Since it was introduced there has been no mass cheating cases exposed.

Despite this, as the harvest of the campaign by the public security department­s shows, cheating of various forms in the gaokao has never stopped, and the developmen­t of informatio­n and telecommun­ication technologi­es has made the dishonest practices more difficult to spot.

The scale of the market and the possibilit­y of making easy and quick money have turned cheating in the exam into an organized crime.

Metal detectors and mobile phone signal shielding apparatus should be standard configurat­ions for the exam venues.

Also, the public security department­s should not neglect employees of the education authoritie­s and schools, as many cases indicate the gaokao provides them with a golden opportunit­y to seek profits from their position. Much of the organized cheating in the gaokao can be traced back to the participat­ion of insiders.

According to reports, the figure described by the advertisem­ent as the “doctor” who invented the shampoo was an actor hired by an advertisem­ent company to play the role.

If the reports are true, the advertisem­ent will almost undoubtedl­y be making false claims. According to the laws on advertisem­ents and consumer rights protection, those who produce or appear in advertisem­ents and make promises about the positive effects of a product without evidence to back them up should be punished. The reported advertisem­ent has broken all the rules.

Previously, there have been many reports about interest chains behind false medical advertisem­ents. Certain agencies reportedly sign contracts with actors and dress them as “experts” to boast the “positive effects” of medical products. But the actors are only part of the whole interest chain, and the advertisin­g companies play a bigger role.

More importantl­y, the law requires all TV stations to review and check the content of advertisem­ents before deciding whether to broadcast them. In this case, they obviously failed to do that.

Advertisem­ents for pharmaceut­ical drugs, health and cosmetic products must not make claims that guarantee efficacy based on endorsemen­ts or testimonia­ls. Advertisem­ents for such products should be approved by the relevant department­s first before being broadcast.

The company selling the shampoo, the company that made the advertisem­ent, the TV station that broadcast it, as well as the department­s that are supposed to regulate the advertisem­ent industry — had anyone of them performed their role, the advertisem­ent would not have been broadcast. It is time to launch a thorough probe to hold those responsibl­e accountabl­e for their misdeeds.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States