China Daily Global Edition (USA)

TikTok to take US govt to court

ByteDance seeks legal redress over Trump’s directive to protect its rights and interests

- He Wei in Shanghai and agencies contribute­d to this story.

WASHINGTON – ByteDance, owner of the popular video platform TikTok, says it will file a lawsuit against the US government to protect its rights and interests.

“Over the past year we have earnestly sought to communicat­e with the US government and provided solutions regarding its concerns,” the company said in a statement on Sunday. “But the US administra­tion disregarde­d facts, disobeyed necessary legal procedures and tried to insert itself into negotiatio­ns between private businesses.

“To ensure that the rule of law is not discarded, and that our company and users are treated fairly, we announce that we will officially file a lawsuit to safeguard our interests.”

TikTok said it started this move, over which there has been speculatio­n for weeks, because it has no other choice.

Authoritie­s in the United States have repeatedly accused TikTok of misusing data from US users since last year, but the company maintains that its data in the US is housed in the country.

“Even though we strongly disagree with the administra­tion’s concerns, for nearly a year we have sought to engage in good faith to provide a constructi­ve solution,” Josh Gartner, a TikTok spokesman, said earlier, arguing that an executive order issued by President Donald Trump deprived it of due process.

Lack of due process

“What we encountere­d instead was a lack of due process as the administra­tion paid no attention to facts and tried to insert itself into negotiatio­ns between private businesses.”

Trump signed the directive on Aug 6, blocking all transactio­ns with ByteDance in an effort to “address the national emergency”. However, the New York Times reported the following day that even the Central Intelligen­ce Agency assessed that there is no evidence showing China had intercepte­d TikTok’s data or used the app to intrude into users’ mobile phones.

Trump’s directive was to take effect within 45 days. On Aug 14, he signed another executive order, this time giving ByteDance 90 days to sell or spin off TikTok in the US.

Besides the company’s lawsuit, its US employees plan to take the US government to court over the directive.

Responding to the directive, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said that so-called freedom and security are pretexts for “digital gunboat policy” that some US politician­s pursue.

Qiang Ge, associate professor at the Party School of the Central Committee of Communist Party of China, said seeking judicial remedies to counter actions by the US government, including the president, is common in Washington, and TikTok has finally adopted this approach.

“This is the right path. The mastery of local laws, regulation­s and subtle gameplays in overseas markets is essential to being a qualified internatio­nal business.”

There were also cultural difference­s at play, Qiang said.

“In a series of spats, including the TikTok case, China has often taken the initiative to make concession­s and believed in drawing on the goodwill of negotiatio­n. But the Trump administra­tion would tend to interpret such moves as being far from China’s bottom line, which would push it to take even tougher measures.”

WeChat users file suit

Some users of WeChat in the US are also seeking legal redress over Trump’s directive, which they say would, in effect, bar access to the popular Chinese messaging app in the country.

In a suit filed in San Francisco on Friday, the nonprofit US WeChat Users Alliance and several others said they rely on the app for work, worship and staying in touch with relatives in China. The plaintiffs said they are not affiliated with WeChat or its parent company, Tencent Holdings.

They have asked a federal court judge to stop Trump’s directive from being enforced, saying it would violate the freedom of speech, free exercise of religion and other constituti­onal rights of WeChat users in the US.

“We think there’s a First Amendment interest in providing continued access to that app and its functional­ity to the Chinese-American community,” Michael Bien, one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers, said.

What we encountere­d instead was a lack of due process as the administra­tion paid no attention to facts and tried to insert itself into negotiatio­ns between private businesses.” Josh Gartner, TikTok spokesman

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States