Connecticut Post (Sunday)

‘ We’re just barely holding on’

Bridgeport health chief eyes rise in coronaviru­s cases, considers future restrictio­ns

- By Brian Lockhart

BRIDGEPORT — A pandemic hot spot earlier in the health crisis, as of this week Connecticu­t’s largest city had seemed to be doing well controllin­g the novel coronaviru­s’ spread.

Unlike suburban neighbor Fairfield and urban centers like Norwalk, Danbury, Waterbury, Hartford and New London that are on “red” alert, Bridgeport

on Thursday had maintained its yellow ranking on the state’s weekly colorcoded map of cases.

But on Friday city Health Director Lisa Morrissey wanted residents to know that the trend in Bridgeport is not good.

“We’re just barely holding on to our yellow,” Morrissey said. “I’ve communicat­ed out internally and to our community ( healthcare) providers, I actually think we’re already in the orange.”

Connecticu­t’s justlaunch­ed color- coding system has four categories: grey, which is less than five cases per 100,000 people; yellow, five to nine cases per 100,000; orange, 10 to 14 cases per 100,000; and red, 15 or more cases per 100,000.

Morrissey noted how

Bridgeport’s case rate as of Thursday was 8.6 per 100,000 and not far from crossing into orange alert. And she believes that, were it not for a possible lag in testing data, the city may have already reached that threshold.

And, Morrissey added, “It’s a concern that Fairfield has gone red. ... We’re not in a bubble. I know as cases rise around us, they will also be rising here.”

“I tell people, ‘ Plan like we’re in the orange,’ ” Morrissey said. “We’re starting to look at what does that mean for us as a community? ... We had several meetings over the last few days talking about it’s time to start thinking about scaling back some public events, reminding people to postpone indoor activities where they can’t maintain social distancing.”

Recently the governor, who when COVID- 19 first struck Connecticu­t in midMarch had residents across Connecticu­t stay home and businesses shuttered to reduce the spread, gave cities and towns the ability to independen­tly roll back certain re- openings if virus cases there reach red. So, for example, returning to stricter limits on indoor capacity at restaurant­s and other businesses/ attraction­s that were eased earlier this month.

Morrissey said it was too early to talk about what Bridgeport might curtail if necessary. She said the health and emergency management department­s, the mayor and chief administra­tive officer are “having those conversati­ons.”

She is not afraid to seek more restrictio­ns if necessary — “it would be a hard pill to swallow but something everyone would be willing to do if it meant taking those precaution­s to save lives” — but also acknowledg­ed the big responsibi­lity that local officials now face when it is up to them to revisit restrictio­ns and shutdowns.

“Any feelings, good or bad, that arise from those decisions will be squarely upon the municipali­ty,” Morrissey said.

While Ganim early on in the pandemic was somewhat more aggressive than even his peers or the state and establishe­d a voluntary local curfew, many Bridgeport businesses, particular­ly downtown, have been struggling to stay open during the pandemic.

Lauren Coakley Vincent, president of the Bridgeport Downtown Special Services District which promotes that neighborho­od, said her organizati­on would “definitely want to be” part of any discussion­s involving a red alert strategy.

Ganim’s office referred to comments he made on that topic Wednesday on WICC- AM radio.

“I don’t know that we’re going to take any different action in Bridgeport despite the ability to do that at this time, but we are constantly looking at it and monitoring it as the numbers might change,” the mayor said.

Ganim emphasized the city will continue to crack down on individual­s or businesses that “flaunt” health and safety protocols — from wearing masks to capacity limits — “so we don’t contribute, we don’t allow people to get lax, violate rules, disrespect others and add to what might be a rise in this pandemic.”

Morrissey noted while she wants residents and business owners to be aware of the increased cases in Bridgeport, her goal is not to unnecessar­ily scare people.

“Orange isn’t a precursor to ‘ freak out,’ ” Morrissey said. “It’s an acknowledg­ment that the situation is getting worse and we need to prepare ourselves that we could eventually see more cases. And it’s an opportunit­y to say, ‘ What can we be doing differentl­y to try to minimize the impact ( and) re- energize people to go back to take precaution­s?’ ”

She continued: “With everything that we’ve learned from March until now, we can do a better job in the fall than the spring at minimizing some of the community transmissi­on. We have now a better system in place — it’s more robust — to get the message out quickly. And we’ve learned the community can easily pivot and adapt ( and) it won’t be this panicked, frenzied response.”

 ?? Ned Gerard / Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo ?? Hundreds of people turned out for COVID- 19 tests at Liberation Programs in Bridgeport on July 9.
Ned Gerard / Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo Hundreds of people turned out for COVID- 19 tests at Liberation Programs in Bridgeport on July 9.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States