Connecticut Post (Sunday)

Lawmakers push bill to forgive unemployme­nt ‘overpaymen­ts’

- By Andrew Brown

Connecticu­t lawmakers are set to consider a bill this session that would provide financial relief to individual­s who received unemployme­nt benefits during the pandemic but were later ordered to repay all, or part, of that money to the state.

The proposed legislatio­n would allow thousands of additional people to qualify for forgivenes­s from what the state describes as “overpaymen­ts,” which occur when someone republishe­d ceives jobless benefits that they are later found to be ineligible for.

Overpaymen­ts are a normal part of running a state unemployme­nt program. The federal government requires states to identify instances where money was improperly issued to people.

But the problem became more pronounced during the coronaviru­s pandemic as millions of Americans lost their jobs and state labor department­s were inundated by a historic number of jobless claims.

The Connecticu­t Mirror a story last year highlighti­ng the millions of dollars in overpaymen­ts that the state Department of Labor identified in early 2021 and the growing number of people who were receiving demands to return that money.

But the problem has only grown since then.

Connecticu­t’s Department of Labor identified more than $25.7 million in overpaymen­ts in 2021, which is more than the previous two years combined. And that doesn’t include all of the federal unemployme­nt programs that people collected money from during the pandemic.

An unspecifie­d portion of those overpaymen­ts are tied to fraud. But many others are the result of unintentio­nal mistakes on the part of unemployme­nt applicants or the state.

It’s the latter cases that state Democratic lawmakers want to remedy with the legislatio­n this year, which they refer to as unemployme­nt “amnesty.”

Sen. Julie Kushner, DDanbury, said it is unfair to ask workers who honestly submitted an unemployme­nt applicatio­n to repay money because of filing errors or other mistakes that were outside of their control.

The concern among lawmakers, Kushner said, is that households that are just starting to recover from the recession will be forced to repay a significan­t amount of money — in some cases, tens of thousands of dollars.

“Too frequently, the money has already been spent, and the person isn’t earning enough to repay,” said Kushner, who chairs the legislatur­e’s Labor and Public Employee Committee.

The bill that Kushner and her colleagues introduced did not get much attention during a busy public hearing this week, but several groups, including the state’s most prominent labor organizati­on, submitted written testimony in support of the legislatio­n.

Ed Hawthorne, the president of the Connecticu­t AFL-CIO, which represents roughly 200,000 unionized workers in the state, argued the legislatio­n was needed to protect the tens of thousands of people who filed for unemployme­nt assistance during the pandemic.

“Unemployme­nt insurance should have provided them some assistance and helped quiet their fears until they could return to work,” Hawthorne wrote in his testimony. “Unfortunat­ely for some workers, their unemployme­nt applicatio­ns may have contained mistakes, were mishandled, or not adequately reviewed for months.”

“They received weekly payments to help survive the downturn, but now, months later, the state has deemed them ineligible and wants that money back,” he added, citing the CT Mirror’s story last year.

Seeking forgivenes­s

There is already a process in place for people to apply for forgivenes­s of overpaymen­ts as long as state officials don’t allege any fraudulent behavior on behalf of the unemployme­nt applicant.

Data that is submitted to the federal government shows Connecticu­t used that process to waive more than $5.4 million last year — or roughly 21% of the overpaymen­ts the state identified in that time frame.

Eligibilit­y for the waivers requires certain findings by the state. The overpaymen­t, for instance, needs to be caused by “unintentio­nal error” or the state overturnin­g someone’s benefits after an appeal hearing.

It’s ultimately up to state officials in the Department of Labor to make the determinat­ion in each case.

The agency also takes into account things like whether someone filed for bankruptcy or whether the person has a mental or physical disability that limits their chances of finding a new job. The applicant’s death can also guarantee them a waiver.

But Democratic lawmakers are concerned that a significan­t number of people may have missed their chance to apply for that forgivenes­s during the pandemic.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States