Connecticut Post (Sunday)

Seeking reform after primary controvers­y

-

In light of the present alleged absentee ballot scandal in Bridgeport, the task at hand is to remedy this issue.

The objectives for accomplish­ing this task must include:

1) Giving the absentee ballot voter the same ballot security that the voter in the polling place receives.

2) Political operatives must be prohibited from "influencin­g" absentee ballot voters and replaced by neutral coordinato­rs under the auspices of the registrars.

3) Supervised absentee balloting must be expanded.

In order to do this:

We call upon the secretary of the state to construct informatio­nal videos on all facets of the absentee ballot. How to apply, fill out, mail properly and who can and cannot not handle the absentee ballot.

We believe that supervised balloting must be expanded and supervised by coordinato­rs, duly appointed by registrars that are neutral parties.

We believe that the state Legislatur­e is the entity that must remedy the corrupt absentee ballot process through effective anti-fraud legislatio­n.

Therefore we call upon the state Legislatur­e to restore the "Pilot program for absentee voting" described in state statute Sec. 9-163k. This pilot program took place in 2003 in which three towns participat­ed. That pilot program limited the distributi­on of absentee ballot applicatio­ns to town clerks, registrars of voters, and absentee ballot coordinato­rs (a position the bill creates). It also allows municipal clerks, registrars of voters, and absentee ballot coordinato­rs to help voters complete their absentee ballot applicatio­ns.

Presently, it is mandated that the registrars provide supervised absentee ballot voting to veterans' health care facilities, residentia­l care homes, health care facilities for people with disabiliti­es, nursing homes, rest homes, mental health facilities, alcohol or drug treatment facilities, or school infirmarie­s.

What is also allowed at the discretion of the registrar is supervised absentee voting under the rules set by Public Act 05-235 subsection L:

“Notwithsta­nding any provision of the general statutes, if a town clerk receives 20 or more absentee ballot applicatio­ns from the same street address in a town, including, but not limited to, an apartment building or complex, absentee ballots voted by the electors submitting such applicatio­ns may, at the discretion of the registrars of voters of such town, be voted under the supervisio­n of such registrars of voters or their designees in accordance with the same procedures set forth in this section for supervised absentee voting at institutio­ns."

Therefore, an inventory of residentia­l buildings having at least twenty electors residing in a building with the same address existing within a municipali­ty should be taken and the town clerk notified that they qualify for supervised balloting.

We ask the State Elections Enforcemen­t Commission to interview a proper sampling of the approximat­ely 2,400 absentee voters that participat­ed in the Bridgeport primary to ascertain if wrongdoing occurred. The SEEC has the power to subpoena people if need be if wrongdoing is suspected.

Mike Garrett Marc Delmonico Bridgeport Republican Town Committee

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States