Connecticut Post

Families want state to stop profiting from prison phone calls

Lawmaker backs effort to end practice

- By Lisa Backus

HARTFORD — After bringing attention last year to high phone costs for families calling their loved ones in state prisons, state Rep. Josh Elliott is again leading the charge to pass legislatio­n to end the practice of allowing the state to profit from the calls.

Currently, the state collects a 68 percent commission on all calls family members make to inmates.

“We absolutely, hands down, are going to get this done,’ Elliott, D-Hamden, told a crowd gathered Thursday at the Legislativ­e Office Building to show support for the proposed bill.

Elliott and advocates for prison reform, including the New York-based advocacy group “Worth Rises,” want the state to end what critics call a “kickback” to Connecticu­t coffers by renegotiat­ing the phone contract that adds a commission to the cost of the calls.

Elliott and the rest of the advocates are hoping proposed legislatio­n currently before the Judiciary Committee will put an end to the practice.

The cost of the calls is about $5 for 15 minutes of phone time. The phone fees heavily impact the poorest communitie­s in the state whose residents are more likely to be incarcerat­ed, said Brittany Kane, project coordinato­r for the Connecticu­t Children with Incarcerat­ed Parents Initiative.

“Children and families have not committed any crime but they are serving time with their loved one every step of the way,” Kane said.

The state is taking in about $7.7 million annually by charging up to 68 percent more than the actual cost of the service for certain in-state calls. The state’s Criminal Justice Informatio­n System receives about $2 million annually from the phone contract and the state Department of Correction receives about $350,000, which is used to pay for programs for inmates.

The rest of the money, about $5.5 million, goes to the Judicial Branch to pay for probation officers in a specialize­d unit that works to ensure that those on probation don’t get rearrested for technical violations.

The effort to reduce the cost of calls was given a boost last week when Gov. Ned Lamont agreed to give the Judicial Branch $3.5 million in funding to pay for the 32 probation officers funded by the phone commission­s.

Chief Court Administra­tor Patrick Carroll lauded the $3.5 million — but also pointed out that it came with a $2 million cut elsewhere. Advocates for reducing the inmate phone rates cried foul at the suggestion that the Judicial Branch still needed the $2 million, which was supposed to fund the probation officers.

“The only reason that it sounds like a lot of money is because the state has been unethicall­y taking as a commission,” said Bianca Tylek, executive director of Worth Rises.

Advocates estimate that if the state Department of Administra­tive Services were to renegotiat­e the prison phone contract with Securus Technologi­es, it

phone rates would be as low as a penny a minute, costing the state about $1.7 million a year, Tylek said.

However, advocates want the state to make the prison phone calls free.

“The governor provided $3.5 million and cut $2 million from the Judicial

Branch budget that they didn’t need to fund the probation officers,” Tylek said. “We’re asking the legislatur­e to find it in their budget to fill the $2.3 million gap and to find $1.7 million for the phone service.”

Prison phone providers are “exploiting our bond” by charging commission­s above regular phone rates for families who are trying to stay in contact with loved ones while they are incarcerat­ed, said Martin Garcia, community coordinato­r for Worth Rises.

As a formerly incarcerat­ed individual who also has a parent who has been incarcerat­ed, Garcia understand­s the issue all too well, he told the crowd. “We all hurt because we couldn’t afford to speak every day,” Garcia said.

During the 2019 legislativ­e session, Elliott’s bill made it out of the Judiciary and Appropriat­ions committees and was discussed on the House floor, but was never passed.

This session, Elliott said support is building and he’s hoping to get the legislatio­n to the governor’s desk. The contract for Securus that includes the commission can’t be renegotiat­ed unless the legislatur­e makes some kind of move, Tylek said.

“If we want to consider ourselves a leader in criminal justice reform, this is one of the first steps we have to take,” Elliott said.

 ?? Brian A. Pounds / Hearst Connecticu­t Media ?? The Bridgeport Correction­al Center on North Avenue in Bridgeport.
Brian A. Pounds / Hearst Connecticu­t Media The Bridgeport Correction­al Center on North Avenue in Bridgeport.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States