Connecticut Post

We can end voter suppressio­n

- By Gemeem Davis and Callie Gale Heilmann Gemeem Davis is president and co-director of Bridgeport Generation Now Votes and Callie Gale Heilmann is co-director of Bridgeport Generation Now Votes.

The Connecticu­t General Assembly has a once-in-a-decade chance to end voter suppressio­n in Connecticu­t and systemic corruption in Bridgeport.

House Joint Resolution No. 58 and House Joint Resolution No. 59 would create ballot referendum­s for Connecticu­t voters to ask two important questions: “Shall the Constituti­on be amended to permit the General Assembly to allow any voter, for any reason, to vote by absentee ballot?” and “Shall the Constituti­on of the State be amended to permit the General Assembly to provide for early voting?”

The loud and clear answer to these two resolution­s is a resounding yes. By limiting in-person voting to Election Day and by placing restrictio­ns on who is eligible to vote early by mail using an absentee ballot, Connecticu­t is engaged in a racist, classist and ableist system of voter suppressio­n. In fact, only six states do not allow for early, inperson voting: Connecticu­t, Kentucky, Mississipp­i, Missouri, New Hampshire and South Carolina. As for vote-by-mail, Connecticu­t is only one of 16 states that requires an excuse to vote absentee.

These restrictio­ns target our state’s Black and brown communitie­s and disenfranc­hise Connecticu­t’s

low-income, working-class citizens while creating significan­t burdens on our disabled, homebound and elderly voters. In order to create an inclusive, multiracia­l democracy in this state, we need real, structural change. A system for all mail-in voting and early voting would unleash democratic power in our state.

For the voters of Bridgeport, the amendments proposed in HJ 58 and 59 would revolution­ize our local elections. During the 2020 presidenti­al election, thanks to the expanded access of absentee voting, Bridgeport far surpassed Connecticu­t’s other large cities with a record 72 percent turnout. Voters we spoke with enjoyed using an absentee ballot from the safety of their home and the convenienc­e of the ballot drop boxes. Our voters are educated and motivated. We just need to create the right environmen­t for full enfranchis­ement and free and fair elections.

These amendments would also help end systemic corruption in our city. For generation­s, it’s been an open secret that Bridgeport voters suffer under absentee ballot fraud and abuse, perpetrate­d by political operatives connected to our local Democratic Town Committee. The closed nature of Connecticu­t elections — and the burdens placed on voters to exercise our right to vote — mean local elections in Bridgeport are manipulate­d because political actors continue to be highly motivated. These operatives are paid to abuse the absentee ballot process by targeting, defrauding and manipulati­ng our youth, elderly, disabled, low-income and Spanish-speaking residents, all for the purpose of controllin­g the outcomes of our local elections.

Bridgeport­ers know the game is rigged, which drives our voter participat­ion and civic engagement down. From 2015 to 2019, Bridgeport saw a 23 percent decrease in voter participat­ion in our local elections. By passing these two resolution­s, the Connecticu­t voters would be able to decide whether to amend our constituti­on and enfranchis­e tens of thousands of Bridgeport voters to vote on their own accord and their own timeline, thereby diluting the power of greedy politician­s to target and manipulate our election results.

The people of Bridgeport deserve free and fair elections. It’s time to put the question to Connecticu­t voters and build the expansive, open democracy of which we all can be proud.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States