Connecticut Post

Remove statue of Mystic Massacre leader from state Capitol, tribes urge

- By Ken Dixon kdixon@ctpost.com Twitter: @KenDixonCT

Although the slaughter and enslavemen­t of Native Americans in the 1637 Mystic Massacre predates internatio­nal standards of behavior during armed conflicts, Maj. John Mason is a war criminal and his statue above the state Capitol’s north entrance is a lingering symbol that should be removed, Connecticu­t tribal leaders say.

But state historians warn against generaliti­es and the possible reaction of hiding Connecticu­t’s past, when the current moment in time could be ripe to commission statues of historic Native American leaders to join the larger-than-life marble likenesses of English settlers on the Capitol’s exterior.

In written and video testimony sent to the State Capitol Preservati­on & Restoratio­n Commission in advance of Thursday’s forum on the future of the statue, Rodney Butler, chairman of the Mashantuck­et Pequot Tribal Nation and Chief Many Hearts Lynn Malerba from the Mohegan Tribe, say the intimidati­ng symbol of white supremacy should be relocated to a museum.

“There is no doubt Mason engaged in what we now call genocide,” Butler says in a video sent to the commission. “The question for us here in the year 2021, is whether a man who burned alive over 500 men, women and children; systematic­ally hunted and slaughtere­d any remaining members of the tribe; and intended to eradicate an entire cultural identity, language and heritage deserves a place of distinctio­n on the face of Connecticu­t’s State Capitol. I submit to you that he does not.”

Mason was the leader of a colonial militia during the Pequot War and joined the Mohegan Tribe in defeating the Eastern Pequots at the battle of Mystic. Uncas, the Mohegan’s leader, or sachem, was appalled at the carnage, particular­ly the slaughter of women and children, according to the tribe’s oral history.

“If the State Capitol is ‘the house of our Connecticu­t people,’ then all people should feel comfortabl­e visiting the Capitol,” Malerba wrote, stressing that while the Mohegan and Narraganse­tt tribes allied with the English settlers on the attack at Mystic village, the brutality was shocking.

“It was not our form of conflict,” Malerba wrote. “Our form of conflict was with other tribal warriors: to embarrass other tribal leaders, address territoria­l disputes, extend authority and increase power. Casualties were to be kept to a minimum given our small population­s. Elders, women and children were not to be attacked. Our oral traditions tell us that Uncas was distraught during the attack and said, ‘It is too much, it is too much.’ However, in the eyes of the colonists, this battle was so successful as the United States settled westward lands were taken by force and similar brutality, including Mohegan lands.”

The commission, whose members include former and current state lawmakers, nonpartisa­n legislativ­e staff and historians, will hold the forum of invited guests to air the issues of possible removal. The project of taking down and relocating the statue is included in the current state budget, although bids for the project have exceeded the amount projected.

But Walter Woodward, the retiring state historian, and Jason Warren, a retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel who is a military historian, argue the Mason statue should remain, stressing that the details around the Mystic battle are complicate­d.

“Far from hating all Indians or planning their extirpatio­n, Mason enlisted the support of sachem or chief Uncas and his Mohegan native group that were rivals of the Pequots,” Warren wrote to the commission. “After launching his assault on Mystic Fort, Mason’s heavily outnumbere­d army came under threat of annihilati­on. In an act of military necessity, based at least on the limited sources still available for interpreta­tion, Mason ordered the burning of the fort that led to the deaths of many Pequot non-combatants that permanentl­y altered the demographi­cs of the native group.”

Warren believes Mason did not intend to kill noncombata­nts, but the decision to burn the fort was made under duress, in battle.

“The destructio­n of the fort resulted in the downfall of Pequot power, a situation that preserved Connecticu­t Colony, and a consequenc­e that Connecticu­t citizens continue to benefit from indirectly,” Warren wrote to the commission.

The statue of Mason was hoisted into a third-floor niche overlookin­g the Capitol grounds and adjacent Bushnell Park in 1910 — 32 years after the building was completed. There are 26 Gothic niches, several of which are empty. The statues are of early white male leaders, except for one on the south facade depicting Gov. Ella T. Grasso, the nation’s first female governor, who died in 1981.

The north and east facades include statues of men who participat­ed in the founding of the state and the American Revolution. The south facade includes Civil War leaders.

 ?? Kassi Jackson / Associated Press ?? A statue of Maj. John Mason at the state Capitol in Hartford.
Kassi Jackson / Associated Press A statue of Maj. John Mason at the state Capitol in Hartford.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States