Connecticut Post

Researcher: Omicron subvariant spreading in Connecticu­t

- By Jordan Nathaniel Fenster

An omicron subvariant called BA.2 may be spreading in Connecticu­t, a month later than was initially expected.

BA.2 is a direct descendant of the omicron variant, also referred to as “BA.1,” which caused a spike in infections and hospitaliz­ations across and beyond Connecticu­t.

When BA.2 emerged in Europe, public health experts feared it would quickly surpass its ancestor.

“We’ve all been thinking this was going to happen for a long time, waiting for it to happen,” said Nathan Grubaugh, whose laboratory at Yale conducts the lion’s share of genetic sequencing of coronaviru­ses in the state. “Our first detection of it in Connecticu­t was on Jan. 8 and I think we were thinking it was more transmissi­ble than BA.1 than it actually is.”

Grubaugh said omicron, BA.1, is about 100 percent more transmissi­ble than the delta variant. He was concerned when BA.2 first emerged that it was that much more infectious than BA.1.

“A lot of those early warnings, at that point we don’t really know its properties,” he said.

More recent data suggests that BA.2 is about 30 percent more transmissi­ble than omicron, which Grubaugh said is “still a lot.”

“I still think it’s going to arise and become dominant, it's just off by a month or two,” he said. “There are a lot of interestin­g parallels between the emergence of BA.2 and alpha a year ago. That, we first detected in Connecticu­t very early January and it didn't become dominant until March or April.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released Friday the results of a study showing an “omicron infection resulted in high

transmissi­on among household contacts.”

The study, which covered patients in four United States jurisdicti­ons, including Connecticu­t, showed family transmissi­on was particular­ly high among patients “who were not vaccinated or who did not take measures to reduce the risk of transmissi­on to household contacts.”

While they are relatives, the subvariant differs from omicron in some significan­t ways.

One feature of omicron is an “S-gene dropout.” BA.2, similar to delta, does not have that feature. Samples must be geneticall­y sequenced to confirm which variant caused an infection.

Testing for the S-gene dropout is a faster and simpler process, but it’s not conclusive. If a sample presents with that feature, it’s probably omicron, Grubaugh explained.

Last week, 98 percent of samples were most likely omicron, Grubaugh said. This week, there was about a 10 percent drop to 88 percent, he said.

“I have a hard time putting a value on the percent rise in BA.2 from last week,” Grubaugh said. “Ten percent is in the range of possibilit­y, but it could be 3 percent. A 10 percent rise is higher than I would have expected.”

Several factors may have contribute­d to BA.2’s slowerthan-expected rise, including the spike in cases caused by omicron.

 ?? ?? Nathan Grubaugh / Contribute­d photo Yale researcher Nathan Grubaugh
Nathan Grubaugh / Contribute­d photo Yale researcher Nathan Grubaugh

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States