Cupertino Courier

Vaccinatio­n site alerts alarming

Many in region think emergency system isn’t the proper platform

- By Maggie Angst mangst@ bayareanew­sgroup.com

On a recent weekday, Linda Cain was driving on Highway 237 with her husband when suddenly their cell phones began blaring.

The 77-year-old Sunnyvale resident assumed it was an Amber Alert or warning of an impending natural disaster. But when she glanced down at her phone, she saw informatio­n about a small pop-up vaccinatio­n clinic in San Jose — miles away from where she lives.

“It’s scary when you get an alert like that,” said Cain, who was fully vaccinated months earlier. “If it’s a real emergency, I understand. But this had no effect on us whatsoever.”

Since May, the city of San Jose has been using wireless emergency alerts to disseminat­e informatio­n about vaccinatio­n clinics in parts of the city with disproport­ionately low vaccinatio­n rates. But instead of specifical­ly notifying residents in neighborho­ods surroundin­g the clinic, these geographic­ally targeted alerts have gone out to thousands of people with cell phones inside and outside of San Jose city limits.

The Wireless Emergency Alerts program, which is run by FEMA, the Federal Communicat­ions Commission and wireless providers, is intended to give authoritie­s across the nation an easy way to deliver critical informatio­n to enhance public safety. It allows cities like San Jose to send out short emergency messages, broadcast from cell towers, to any alertenabl­ed cell phone in a certain area.

Just like an Amber Alert, these messages pop up on the home screen of a cell phone and are accompanie­d by a loud screeching sound and vibration, both repeated twice.

While cities and counties use the system to send out emergency informatio­n about floods, wildfires and other natural or human-made disasters like gas leaks, San Jose is one of only a half dozen jurisdicti­ons in California that have taken the unconventi­onal step of using it to push out informatio­n about vaccinatio­n clinics.

That decision by the city’s top emergency management officials has drawn the ire of San Jose residents and those living in neighborin­g cities who feel like it’s a misuse of the emergency alert system.

“I get the importance of vaccinatio­ns, but this is not an appropriat­e localized use,” said Jason Sholl, a 41-year-old San Jose resident. “They’ve abused it.”

Harry Cutts, a Mountain View resident who isn’t sure why he received an alert about a San Jose vaccine clinic back in May, said the city’s decision to push out informatio­n that was “blatantly non-urgent” was a “bad use of an intrusive alert system”

“It’s the classic story about crying wolf,” he said. “Use it too many times and people are just going to go ‘that’s not something urgent’ when it’s really something that they needed to know about.”

San Jose has sent out about 21 alerts this year — more than the previous four years combined — and most of those messages have been about a single, one-day vaccinatio­n clinic.

Fed up with the broad alerts they say don’t apply to them, Sholl and others have gone into their phone settings to turn off the alerts, despite the potential risk of missing emergency informatio­n that could more directly affect them.

“That’s a risk that I just have to understand is in my hands,” Sholl said, adding that he still receives push notificati­ons from other sources such as news stations and weather apps.

In light of revelation­s that the vaccinatio­n rollout was lagging in certain areas of San Jose, especially in neighborho­ods of predominan­tly Latino residents, city officials last spring began using the wireless cellular alert system to reach residents who may not have access to the internet and are harder to reach through more typical awareness campaigns.

When verifying with FEMA and the state’s Office of Emergency Services that it was an acceptable use of the system, city officials were informed that five other cities and countries in California were already using it for the same purpose. Those jurisdicti­ons are Imperial County, Costa Mesa, Long Beach, Los Angeles and Montezuma County.

So far, San Jose officials say the approach has yielded positive results.

Several vaccine clinics held recently without the benefit of an alert attracted fewer than 10 residents while some accompanie­d by an alert saw attendance exceed 100, according to Raymond Riordan, director of San Jose’s Office of Emergency Management.

Although officials weighed the risk of people possibly turning off their alerts and missing important emergency notices, they “felt the need to get the vaccine to those who needed it outweighed the prospect of those who might turn (the alerts) off,” Riordan said.

“We’re being prudent in not using it for every clinic, but targeting clinics that serve underserve­d areas,” he said. “Our target is to get ourselves in a position to deliver more vaccinatio­ns so that we can meet the standard the county health department is trying to reach to reduce mandates for masks and things like that.”

But even though the city has tried to limit alerts to neighborho­ods surroundin­g the clinics, a recent effort by wireless providers to reach all residents who may be in the path of a wildfire, including those in more remote areas, has made it more difficult to finely target specific parts of San Jose, according to Riordan.

Mayor Sam Liccardo said he was “unapologet­ic” about the city’s use of the alert system, calling the notificati­ons a “minor nuisance.”

“We’re in a pandemic. It is a public safety emergency,” he said. “We have the highest vaccinatio­n rate of any major city in the country, which suggests we are probably doing something right.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States