Murdoch acknowledges Fox News hosts endorsed election falsehoods
Rupert Murdoch, chair of the conservative media empire that owns Fox News, acknowledged in a deposition that several hosts for his networks promoted the false narrative that the election in 2020 was stolen from former President Donald Trump, court documents released Monday showed.
“They endorsed,” Murdoch said under oath in response to direct questions about hosts Sean Hannity, Jeanine Pirro, Lou Dobbs and Maria Bartiromo, a legal filing by Dominion Voting Systems said. “I would have liked us to be stronger in denouncing it in hindsight.”
Murdoch's remarks, which he made last month as part of the $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox by Dominion, added to the evidence that Dominion has accumulated in an attempt to prove its central allegation: The people running the country's most popular news network knew Trump's claims of voter fraud during the 2020 election were false but broadcast them anyway.
The new documents and a similar batch released this month revealed that top executives and on-air hosts reacted with incredulity bordering on contempt to the various fictitious allegations about Dominion, including that a secret algorithm in its machines allowed votes to be switched from one candidate to another and that the company was founded in Venezuela to help that country's longtime leader, Hugo Chavez, fix elections.
Dominion's latest filing also described how Paul Ryan, a former Republican speaker of the House and current member of the Fox Corp. board of directors, said in his deposition that
“They endorsed (Trump's election falsehoods.) I would have liked us to be stronger in denouncing it in hindsight.” — Rupert Murdoch, the chairman of Fox Corporation
Murdoch
he had told Murdoch and Murdoch's son Lachlan, the CEO, “Fox News should not be spreading conspiracy theories.” Ryan suggested that the network pivot and “move on from Donald Trump and stop spouting election lies.”
The filing casts Rupert Murdoch as a chair who was both deeply engaged with his senior leadership about coverage of the election and operating at somewhat of a remove, unwilling to interfere. Asked by Dominion's lawyer, Justin Nelson, whether he could have ordered Fox News to keep Trump lawyers like Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani off the air, Murdoch responded: “I could have. But I didn't.”
The filing helps fill in the broader case against Fox News and its corporate parent, Fox Corp., that Dominion lawyers hope to present to a jury in April, when a Delaware judge has scheduled the trial to begin.
A Fox News spokesperson said Monday in response to the filing that Dominion's view of defamation law took “an extreme, unsupported view of defamation law that would prevent journalists from basic reporting.”
Since Dominion sued in early 2021, it has argued that Fox chose ratings and profit over its journalistic obligation to tell viewers the truth.
Using text messages and emails sent by Fox employees and prominent hosts like Hannity and Tucker Carlson in the weeks after the election, Dominion has pieced together a dramatic account from inside the network, depicting a frantic scramble to woo back viewers after ratings collapsed.
On election night, Fox News was the first news outlet to declare Joe Biden the winner of Arizona — effectively projecting that he would become the next president. With Trump refusing to concede that he had lost, he and his supporters turned against Fox, and the network's ratings fell. Soon, many of the most popular hosts and shows on Fox began promoting the outlandish claims that Dominion machines were an integral part of a far-reaching voter fraud conspiracy to deny Trump a second term.
Lawyers for Fox, which filed its response to Dominion in court Monday, have argued that its broadcasts after the election did not amount to defamation because they were protected under the First Amendment. In court filings, Fox has defended its commentary and reporting as the kind of work that any journalistic outfit would do by covering events and newsmakers that are indisputably newsworthy.
Ultimately, the case is likely to revolve around questions about the intent of Fox hosts when they gave pro-Trump election deniers like Powell and Giuliani a platform and, in many cases, mustered no pushback as their guests falsely and repeatedly implicated Dominion in a plot to disenfranchise tens of millions of Trump voters.