Daily Camera (Boulder)

More online

-

Since having my first post-roe encounter be with a despairing neighbor shouting gutwrenchi­ng evening expletives at her America, I have slept on it and awoken to fresh ideas in the face of our cataclysmi­c destiny as a broken nation. Honestly, I have more concern, not to mention business for caring, for the wild sprouting Norwegian Spruce in my front yard than I do for an unwanted fetus inside a fraught and desperate woman, destined almost certainly to a precarious life of burden, hunger, squalor and the ubiquitous violence awaiting a poor, desperate American in the coming future. I’m certain we all have better utility in our hearts and minds than to force fossilized religious zealotry on our neighbors or mere strangers tending by necessity to their own private business.

If this must be the verdict for all of America by six members of the Federalist Society, then my answer is this: The father of that child is conscripte­d to support to the mother and child until that child is self-sufficient. If the mother says, “there he is,” and that’s it. Denial, inability or incapacity can only mean full support from the state government who has forced this burden upon her. I submit that if the

Supreme Court can give permission to state mandated birth, then the federal legislatur­e can force the hand of state support. Such funding shall derive solely from State funds, mandated by raising of taxes on those hapless people living under that oppressive regime devoted to idols and relics of a

In light of the Supreme Court’s gutting of Roe, Democrats need to ask themselves WWMMD? (What Would Mitch Mcconnell Do?). If faced with a 6-3 majority obliterati­ng a cherished conservati­ve precedent, stalwart partisan Mitch Mcconnell would manipulate any and all methods to obtain his party’s desired result.

The Constituti­on is silent on the number of judges on the court. Rather than increase its size, Democrats should pull a Mitch Mcconnell and solve several problems by reducing the court’s size to six (there’s no rule an odd number is required). While Justice Breyer delays his retirement until a restructur­ing is complete, the filibuster for Supreme Court legislatio­n is eliminated and, using a last in, first out provision, the lifetime appointmen­ts of the three justices installed by Mcconnell and Trump are eliminated.

The resulting six member court would actually be more in line with what is expected of a body deciding ultimate legal precedents. Neither liberal nor conservati­ve majorities would dominate, forcing a level of compromise necessary to deliver balanced opinions about the law and

Most of the letters we receive are available online: dailycamer­a.com/letters

To Write the Forum

The Camera welcomes readers’ letters. Timely topics of local interest are given first preference. All letters are subject to editing.

Maximum length for letters is 300 words. Maximum length for guest opinions is 700 words

• Name, full address and daytime phone required

• No anonymous or “open” letters

• No name-calling or ad hominem attacks

• Each writer limited to one letter or guest opinion in any rolling 30day period

• Submission­s must be sent by email. Attachment­s are discourage­d. PDF attachment­s are strongly discourage­d. Write or paste your letter directly into the email window

To reach us:

• Send letters and guest opinions to openforum@dailycamer­a.com

• Call the editorial department at 303-473-1354

• Send questions to ggarrison @prairiemou­ntainmedia.com

Dems need to pull a Mitch

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States