Rent strike: Who pays and how it works
As the pandemic stretches into its seventh month, tenants and landlords have found themselves facing the same question: Who’s going to pay the rent if unemployment continues to hover north of 11%?
After the California Supreme Court’s eviction moratorium expired Sept. 1, Gov. Gavin Newsom and state lawmakers extended protections for residential renters and forestalled evictions until Feb. 1 for people who declared that they lost income due to the coronavirus pandemic. Without a larger national bailout, the state deal is essentially a short-term fix that will convert back rent to civil debt, meaning landlords will still be able to pursue repayment in small claims court.
What this means for renters is that while they get to stay in their homes, the debt keeps piling up.
The most radical strategy advocated by tenant advocates is a rent strike, a formerly fringe political tactic that’s getting mainstream attention. But what does that actually mean? How does it work? And who will end up paying?
In theory, a rent strike is a collective action meant to force a change in living conditions. Tenants withhold payment, or part of their rent, if they don’t have access to clean water, if their apartment has an unresolved safety issue or to dispute a rent increase.
Rent strikes typically take place in multi-unit apartment complexes, where tenants collectively refuse to pay rent until a problem is fixed, essentially forming a union of tenants. But that could be changing during the pandemic as the threat of evictions looms over a far wider swath of tenants.
Tenant advocates say, first and foremost, those who can pay their rent should keep paying their rent. If they choose to withhold it even if they can pay it, they should put that money in a shared escrow account. But for people choosing between rent and food, advocates say the choice should be food and other living expenses.
They also caution that no one should commit a rent strike of one. That’s just refusing to pay your rent. Instead, by joining with other tenants and paying into a collective pot run by activists — in some cases, as little as $10 per month — the tenants will have support from housing attorneys and tenant advocates.
What’s also changing during the pandemic is a broader call for rent strikes among people who are not in multi-unit buildings. That could include people in single-family homes, which would be unprecedented.
The Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, a grant- and membership-funded leftleaning organizing group based in six California counties, is the primary driver behind the statewide coordinated effort.
The ACCE says it’s organizing tenants in Los Angeles and Oakland, among other cities, and one major Bay Area corporate landlord has 12 of their 18 multifamily buildings on a rent strike. The test of the rent strikes’ effectiveness won’t be clear until the end of local and statewide eviction moratorium, or until there is a larger federal or statewide solution for COVIDimpacted tenants.
Beginning just a month after the pandemic, the California Apartment Association warned landlords that a general strike was on the horizon, and indeed that some of its members had already received notices from tenants on a rent strike.
The National Multifamily Housing Council estimates that more than 13% of tenants in America paid no rent by Sept. 13 in a survey of 11.4 million units. That’s up from 11% in April. The apartment association says it recognizes that people are experiencing financial hardship and urges its members to work with tenants to find reasonable solutions. But landlords still conducted at least 1,600 evictions between Mar. 19 and the end of July in 40 counties, including more than 400 evictions since Newsom instituted an eviction moratorium on Mar. 27.