Daily Democrat (Woodland)

Farmworker­s deserve the right to vote by mail in union elections

- By Catherine fisk Catherine Fisk is the Barbara Nachtrieb Armstrong Professor of Law at UC Berkeley Law, where she teaches and writes on labor law.

Assembly Bill 616 would grant to California farmworker­s the same rights to vote by mail in union certificat­ion elections that all California voters enjoy in political elections.

The legislatio­n will fix a major weakness in California’s Agricultur­al Labor Relations Act of 1975 and go a long way toward ensuring that farmworker­s can decide, by free and fair elections, whether they wish to join and bargain with a union.

Under current law, when a sufficient­ly large group of farmworker­s presents a petition to the Agricultur­al Labor Relations Board requesting the board to conduct an election to determine whether they wish union representa­tion, the board schedules an election to be held at a polling place, usually somewhere on or near the grower’s property.

Farmworker­s must go to the poll to cast their vote. Farmworker­s who are illiterate, who fear they will lose their job if the employer sees them entering the polling place, or who cannot manage to get to the poll, lose their right to a democratic process for choosing union representa­tion.

AB 616 would allow farmworker­s to vote by filling out a ballot at home. Just like the ballots California voters are casting in the ongoing gubernator­ial election, the ballot will identify what the employee is voting on, how the employee votes, the employee’s name and signature, and the date.

AB 616 gives employees the right that all California voters enjoy to have assistance in decipherin­g and casting their ballot. Anyone assisting or witnessing the person filling out the ballot must sign it too, so that the Agricultur­al Labor Relations Board can investigat­e claims of voter intimidati­on or misinforma­tion.

The completed ballot must be placed in a sealed envelope provided by the Agricultur­al Labor Relations Board and signed by the voter. That way, no one can tamper with the ballot after it leaves the employee’s hands. And, just like in the ballots California­ns are casting now, completed ballots can be mailed or dropped off at board offices. The board opens the envelopes, counts the ballots, rules on any claims that certain ballots are invalid and determines a winner.

The main difference between what AB 616 requires and all other California elections is that in order for a union to win the election, it must receive votes of a majority of all the employees, not a majority of the votes cast. This means that no farmworker will gain union representa­tion unless a majority of all the employees at that farm want it. Any farmworker who prefers no union can vote against unionizati­on or just refuse to vote.

Critics of AB 616 have said that the vote by mail procedure allows voter fraud. But the requiremen­t that both the worker and anyone assisting the worker sign the ballot is protection against fraud because it allows the board to talk to the worker to be sure the vote represents their free and uncoerced choice.

Critics have also said that AB 616 would turn all elections into a card check process, which employers criticize as allowing union representa­tives or pro-union workers to intimidate voters. But AB 616’s vote by mail process requires the board to distribute and track ballots, to verify the signatures and to investigat­e claims that any ballot does not reflect the free choice of the voter.

And AB 616 provides for a hearing in front of a judge and an opportunit­y to appeal the judge’s ruling on contested ballots. Misconduct in casting or collecting ballots is a basis to set aside an election.

Farmworker­s deserve democratic processes in union elections. AB 616 grants them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States