‘Liberal’ is Obama code for socialist/Marxist

Dear Editor: Because the liberal–left-loving media never really took the time to find out who we were bringing into the White House, the American people were deceived and have been suffering for the past six years.

David Horowitz, a 1960s radical communist and “progressive” leftist, raised by communist parents, writes in his booklet, “Fight Fire with Fire,” that President Obama, Valerie Jarrett and David Axelrod were all raised with the same leftist political goals. Horowitz turned his back on that destructive, political movement and believes Obama and his helpers are still part of this anti-American movement. Instead of calling themselves socialist/Marxist, they call themselves “liberals” and “progressives” and Democrats.

Another serious threat to our nation is Hillary Clinton’s righthand adviser, Huma Abedin, her chief foreign policy adviser on Muslim affairs. Abedin is connected to the Muslim Brotherhood. Some believe she has never broken her ties with the Brotherhood and its anti-American policies. There has never been strong opposition to the Muslim Brotherhood by Obama. The press has remained silent on Huma Abedin’s background.

Progressives, like Obama, are “citizens of the world.” They don’t love America like those of us who are patriots do. “Progressives” on the Supreme Court, like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, believe that the socialist constitution of South Africa is better than America’s, although that document does not protect property rights. Does she, like Obama, love America?

Finally, let us not forget that, when he was first elected, Obama went out and apologized to the world for America being the cause of international problems. Now America is paying the price of a leftist, “progressive” government, transforming America.

Come quickly, 2016, and let’s pray the press does a good job this time.

James T. Varelas U.S. Navy veteran

East Jewett