Daily Freeman (Kingston, NY)

Commission creates cause for concern

- EJ Dionne Columnist E.J. Dionne is syndicated by The Washington Post Writers Group.

Columnist E.J. Dionne writes about the Trump-appopinted body that's investigat­ing unproven voter fraud.

President Trump had some remarkable things to say at the inaugural meeting of his Commission to Promote Voter Suppressio­n and Justify Trump’s False Claims, which is formally known as the Presidenti­al Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. He also asked a question that deserves an answer.

Lest anyone believe Vice President Pence’s claim that “this commission has no preconceiv­ed notions or preordaine­d results,” Trump was on hand last week to state clearly what its agenda is.

With the resignatio­n of Sean Spicer as White House press secretary and the rise of Anthony Scaramucci as White House communicat­ions czar (an appropriat­e word these days), the television cameras are riveted on the latest reality show, “Spicey and The Mooch.” But we dare not lose track of the threat the Trump administra­tion poses to the most basic of democratic rights.

Remember that in January, Trump told congressio­nal leaders that between 3 million and 5 million illegal votes were cast in last year’s election and that they were the reason he lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton by 2.9 million.

There is not a shred of evidence for this — none, zero, zilch. Trump’s defenders could find no plausible way to support his statement, which is not unusual. But Trump never backs off from a falsehood. So instead, he did something without precedent: He appointed a presidenti­al commission solely to justify an offhand lie.

And now that this body exists, it will almost certainly try to find ways to rationaliz­e purging legitimate voters from the rolls and erecting yet more barriers to voting.

Trump would not let the commission­ers forget their reason for being there, his belief that those phantom votes really exist, although he put his own words into the mouths of unnamed “people,” who — surprise! — came to the same conclusion­s he did.

“Throughout the campaign and even after it,” Trump said, “people would come up to me and express their concerns about voter inconsiste­ncies and irregulari­ties, which they saw. In some cases, having to do with very large numbers of people in certain states.”

The commission issued a sweeping request to the states for data that included everything from voters’ Social Security numbers, military status and party affiliatio­n to informatio­n on felony conviction­s. Trump purported to be pleased because “more than 30 states have already agreed to share the informatio­n with the commission.” In truth, the request has been met with widespread resistance from Republican as well as Democratic officials. As of July 8, The Associated Press reported not a single state was in full compliance. The Republican secretary of state of Mississipp­i, Delbert Hosemann, spoke for many of his colleagues (with a regional twist) when he told the administra­tion to “go jump in the Gulf of Mexico.”

Trump is not happy, and he responded in the way he knows best: with innuendo questionin­g the motives of others. “If any state does not want to share this informatio­n, one has to wonder what they’re worried about. And I asked the vice president, I asked the commission: What are they worried about?”

Excellent question. Here’s what we should worry about.

We should worry about the security of the data. States have absolutely no confidence that the Trump administra­tion will protect it. They also have every reason to fear he will misuse it.

We should worry because his commission is the furthest thing imaginable from a dispassion­ate investigat­ion.

We should worry because Kris Kobach, Kansas’ secretary of state, is vice chairman of the commission. Kobach is a voter suppressio­n fanatic.

We should worry because, as Ari Berman noted in The Nation, a new study by MIT found that 12 percent of the electorate in 2016 encountere­d a problem voting, and the Brennan Center reported that more states have enacted new voting restrictio­ns in 2017 than in 2015 and 2016 combined. This commission will push states to enact even more laws like these.

We should worry because the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act in 2013.

And we should worry about the Trump administra­tion closing civil rights offices and the Justice Department switching sides in voting rights cases. As Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said: “I am old enough to remember when African Americans were denied access to the ballot box, and I fear that we are watching history repeat itself.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States