Daily Freeman (Kingston, NY)

A rough year, but American system still stands

- Ruth Marcus Columnist Ruth Marcus is syndicated by The Washington Post Writers Group.

As this appalling year limps to a close, with President Trump consistent­ly underperfo­rming even the lowest of expectatio­ns, a note of holiday cheer: Our country’s institutio­ns and values have proven remarkably resilient.

This outcome was not a given; complacenc­y that it will continue would be dangerous. And yet, after nearly a year of Trump, the warnings about incipient fascism and the insidious ways in which strongmen acquire power feel overblown. I suspected so from the start, but I wasn’t sure — nor should we be cocky about the future.

Still, for now, there are reasons for optimism in the performanc­e of the media, the courts and, yes, even the Republican-dominated Congress — undergirde­d and reinforced by the American people.

On the media: How scary it is to have a president who derides us as “the enemy of the American people”; to have a cable news network that inflames his worst instincts and recklessly flings suggestion­s of a “coup” by special counsel Robert Mueller; to have nearly half the public, egged on by Trump’s bellowing about “fake news,” believing that reporters simply invent negative stories about the president?

But while Trump & Co. went to war against the press, we went to work, to paraphrase Washington Post Executive Editor Martin Baron. Without that work, the public would likely not know about: former national security adviser Michael Flynn’s contacts with the Russians; Donald Trump Jr.’s “I love it” meeting with a Russian lawyer peddling dirt on Hillary Clinton, and the president’s efforts to mislead people about the event; Trump’s descriptio­n of fired FBI Director James Comey as a “nut job” in a meeting with Russian officials in which he also divulged highly classified informatio­n. The list goes on.

And for all the Trump-fomented anger at and distrust of the media, the president has stirred up something else. For the first time in my career, people are thanking me and my colleagues for what we do, a developmen­t that is at once gratifying and unsettling. (It’s our job.) Digital subscripti­ons are soaring at the Post and The New York Times, which helps provide the resources for more rigorous reporting.

The courts have also stood their institutio­nal ground — notwithsta­nding, and perhaps in response to, Trump’s demonstrat­ed contempt for an independen­t judiciary. All three versions of Trump’s misguided effort to ban entry of citizens from certain Muslim-majority nations have been struck down by courts, although the Supreme Court has slowed the latest one to take effect while the litigation continues. So was his attempt to deny federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. So was his cruel, ignorant effort to ban transgende­red people from serving in the military. So was his bid to prevent undocument­ed teenagers from exercising their right to abortion.

All of this could be ephemeral. The ideologica­l balance of the Supreme Court is precarious, and the seat that was denied to Merrick Garland and occupied by Justice Neil Gorsuch will matter long after we are rid of Trump. In contrast to Trump’s incompeten­ce in staffing up the executive branch, and with the exception of a few jaw-droppingly unqualifie­d lowercourt nominees, the Trump team has been diligent in filling the judicial vacancies that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell maneuvered to leave for him.

It is beyond naive to think that these changes won’t matter. But I am not disillusio­ned enough to believe this transforma­tion will leave the separation of powers and the rule of law defenseles­s.

And speaking of separation of powers, there is Congress. It may strain optimism to consider congressio­nal Republican­s, with their rammed-through tax bill and fawning obeisance to Trump, as any kind of bulwark against his excesses. Yet we have seen repeated episodes of congressio­nal resistance, enough of it to make a difference, whether to manifestly unqualifie­d judicial nominees or to ill-intentione­d efforts to dismantle the health care law.

I am not saying this has been a good year. Indeed, it was dreadful. But if Trump was even worse than we expected, our system, imperfect and battered as it is, withstood the onslaught.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States