Daily Freeman (Kingston, NY)

Judge refuses to halt removal of RR tracks

- By Patricia R. Doxsey pdoxsey@freemanonl­ine.com pattiatfre­eman on Twitter

A state Supreme Court justice has rejected a request to halt Ulster County’s removal of railroad tracks along the north rim of the Ashokan Reservoir.

The order was sought by the U&D Railway Revitaliza­tion Corp. in its ongoing effort to stop the conversion of a portion of the 38mile former Ulster & Delaware Railroad corridor into a recreation­al trail.

The group, which also has petitioned the U.S. Surface Transporta­tion Board to determine whether the county has the legal right to remove the tracks, was joined by three nearby landowners in the lawsuit filed in state Supreme Court.

The suit asks the court to prohibit the county from taking up any more railroad tracks along the reservoir pending the federal board’s determinat­ion and to declare invalid any county ownership claims to any of the tracks, ties, signals equipment or supporting structures that once were the property of the railroad.

Taylor-Montgomery, the firm the county hired to remove the tracks, began the process in January.

Larry Roth, a spokesman for the U&D Railway Revitaliza­tion Corp., said the group was “disappoint­ed” by Justice Richard Cahill’s Friday decision, which he said he believed was the result of misreprese­ntations by the county about the amount of work that has been done.

“The facts are not as they stated,” he said.

Roth said the county represente­d to the judge that removal work along the 11.5-mile stretch of the Ashokan Reservoir is about 95 percent complete, but he said aerial photos obtained by the group show that to not be true.

County Attorney Bea Havranek said Monday that the county’s comments before the court were correct.

“I’m not going to get into a public discussion,” she said, citing the ongoing litigation. “Whatever was said before the court was totally accurate.”

In January, the nonprofit U&D Railway Revitaliza­tion Corp. filed a petition with the Surface Transporta­tion Board, questionin­g whether the county had the legal authority to remove the tracks. The group claims the county failed to have the railroad line deemed abandoned by the federal government and therefore cannot remove any tracks along the former Ulster & Delaware corridor. The group says the work being done to remove the tracks along the Ashokan violates not only the National Trails System Act but also the county’s agreement with the New York City Department of Environmen­tal Protection, which owns and operates the reservoir.

Last week, the county filed an 816-page response that included a letter dated April 1, 1977, from the state Department of Transporta­tion that states, in part, “the approval for the abandonmen­t has been made” for the Catskill Mountain branch of the U&D rail line.

In its filing, the county said the line hadn’t been used for regular interstate passenger service since 1956 and that regular freight service ended in 1976, a year before the county claims the line was abandoned and three years before the county purchased the corridor.

Further supporting its claim that the line was abandoned, the county stated in the court papers that in 2016, the state Department of Transporta­tion acquired through eminent domain a portion of the line to enable the state to reconstruc­t and raise a bridge along state Route 28.

On Friday, the New York City Department of Environmen­tal Protection also filed a reply to the U&D Railway Revitaliza­tion Corp. petition, stating the city “agrees with Ulster County’s conclusion that the available facts indicate that the line has long since been abandoned.”

Havrenek, the county’s attorney, declined to comment on the county’s filing.

Roth, speaking for the U&D Railway Revitaliza­tion Corp., said the county in its filing “is saying a number of things that aren’t necessaril­y true.

“Basically, they threw everything at us to try to bury us,” he said.

After four years of debate and discussion over the future of the former rail corridor, the Ulster County Legislatur­e in late 2016 adopted a policy that provides for tourist-related rail opportunit­ies on two sections of the right-ofway and for a recreation­al trail along the north rim of the reservoir.

In response to objections from rail supporters, County Executive Michael Hein negotiated a deal with the city Department of Environmen­tal Protection that he said preserves the railroad right-of-way at the reservoir while allowing for the constructi­on of the recreation­al trail.

The Department of Environmen­tal Protection has stated, however, that it will allow either train access or a trail along the reservoir, but not both.

 ??  ??
 ?? FILE PHOTO BY RYAN LENNOX ?? Rails that have been removed in the former Ulster & Delaware corridor near the Ashokan Reservoir lie side by side last month.
FILE PHOTO BY RYAN LENNOX Rails that have been removed in the former Ulster & Delaware corridor near the Ashokan Reservoir lie side by side last month.
 ?? TANIA BARRICKLO — DAILY FREEMAN FILE ?? Train tracks are removed along Route 28 in Shokan last week.
TANIA BARRICKLO — DAILY FREEMAN FILE Train tracks are removed along Route 28 in Shokan last week.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States