Daily Freeman (Kingston, NY)

Lawmaker wants to revive ‘memorializ­ing resolution­s’

- By Patricia R. Doxsey pdoxsey@freemanonl­ine.com pattiatfre­eman on Twitter

Ulster County Legislator Joseph Maloney has proposed lifting the Legislatur­e’s 11-month-old ban on the introducti­on of memorializ­ing resolution­s.

“I believe in them, and I think they should be there, provided they [the issues] would impact Ulster County specifical­ly,” said Maloney, I-Saugerties.

Memorializ­ing resolution­s carry no force of law and often call on the state or federal government to take a particular action or put the county Legislatur­e on the record on a particular issue.

Memorializ­ing resolution­s were banned by the Ulster County Legislatur­e in April 2017 in a largely party line vote, with all Republican­s and two Democrats voting to end the practice after several lawmakers complained the resolution­s were becoming too politicize­d and polarizing.

Legislatur­e Chairman Ken Ronk, who initially opposed the ban, ultimately co-sponsored the measure to prohibit them, saying Democrats had made “an absolute mockery” of them, with both the number of resolution­s and issues raised in them.

In 2016, 14 memorializ­ing resolution­s were introduced by legislator­s, including measures that opposed the Trans-Pacific Partnershi­p trade deal, supported state legislatio­n that called for the immediate suspension of Common Core education standards, opposed the relicensin­g of the Indian Point nuclear power plant and supported state legislatio­n known as the Gender Expression Nondiscrim­ination Act.

Now, with eight new members in the Legislatur­e, Ronk said he believe’s the dynamic of the body has changed enough to lift the prohibitio­n, though he called Maloney’s proposal “overly broad.”

“I could come up with 50

things that I think uniquely effect Ulster County that others do not,” said Ronk, R-Wallkill.

Ronk said he has been “shopping around” a proposal of his own that would allow memorializ­ing resolution­s to be considered by the Legislatur­e if twothirds

of its 25 members sign on as sponsors.

That way, he said, the Legislatur­e could “speak as one voice but not get into the weeds on things that are just intended to create controvers­y.”

Ronk has not submitted a resolution proposing that change for considerat­ion.

The Legislatur­e’s Laws and Rules Committee will take up Maloney’s proposal on March 19.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States